This appeal against the denial of anticipatory bail was disposed of as the appellants had been admitted to regular bail during the appeal's pendency.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R/CR.A/1614/2018 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1614 of 2018
=============================================================== MAMTABEN GAJENDRASINH SENGAR
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & 1
=============================================================== Appearance:
MR SANDIP M PATEL(5649) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1,2 MR VAIBHAV A VYAS(2896) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1,2 for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 2
MR PRANAV TRIVEDI ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
===============================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.UDHWANI
Date : 29/11/2018
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the appellants states that during the pendency of the appeal, the appellants were arrested and admitted to regular bail. Therefore this appeal against the denial of anticipatory bail does not survive. Accordingly disposed of.
(G.R.UDHWANI, J)
niru*
Page 1 of 1
Mamtabsen Gajendrasinh Sengar
State of Gujarat
G.R. Udhwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
