The High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad granted the petitioner's request to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous application to pursue an alternative remedy.
Permission to withdraw the application with liberty to proceed by alternative remedy granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R/CR.MA/2427/2012 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 2427 of 2012
==========================================================
SANDEEPKUMAR NITYANAND JHA
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. N.D.NANAVATY SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR NANAVATY ADVOCATES(1373) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(11) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 2 MS. KRINA CALLA, APP, (2) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI
Date : 04/12/2018
ORAL ORDER
Mr. N.D. Nanavaty, learned advocate for the
applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present
application with a view to avail of the alternative
remedy as may be legally available.
The permission, as prayed for, is granted.
The present application is dismissed as
withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is clarified
that the Court has not expressed any opinion on the
merits of the case. Notice is discharged. Interim
relief, if any, stands vacated forthwith.
(BELA M. TRIVEDI, J)
AMAR SINGH
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to permission to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous application.
SANDEEPKUMAR NITYANAND JHA
STATE OF GUJARAT
BELA M. TRIVEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court