The High Court at Ahmedabad dismissed a criminal miscellaneous application as infructuous because the underlying criminal case was previously disposed of by a subordinate court.
Discharge of notice; dismissal of the criminal miscellaneous application as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R/CR.MA/12437/2013 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 12437 of 2013
==========================================================
CHAUDHARY AJAYBHAI NARANBHAI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR SIDDHARTH H DAVE(5306) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1,2,3,4 MR JIGAR G GADHAVI(5613) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 2 MS. KRINA CALLA, APP (2) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI
Date : 04/12/2018
ORAL ORDER
As per the Office note, the Criminal Case being
No. 2312 of 2014 has already been disposed of on
24.03.2015 by the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court,
Palanpur. Hence, the present application is
dismissed as having become infructuous. Notice is
discharged.
(BELA M. TRIVEDI, J)
AMAR SINGH
Page 1 of 1
CHAUDHARY AJAYBHAI NARANBHAI
STATE OF GUJARAT
BELA M. TRIVEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court