Allowed

Munaf @ Chacha @ Dosa @ Mama S/O Suleman Vora v. State of Gujarat

Gujarat HC4 Sept 2014SCA/6524/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Special Civil Application challenging a detention order under the Gujarat PASA Act. The observation is that the term 'cruel person' requires habitual involvement necessitated by an element of repetitiveness. As the detaining authority relied on only one offence recorded against the petitioner and lacked any other material to show involvement in similar activities, the subjective satisfaction and t

What did the court decide?

Order of detention dated 02.04.2014 is quashed and set aside. Detenu is ordered to be set at liberty forthwith, if not required in connection with any other case.

Munaf @ Chacha @ Dosa @ Mama S/O Suleman Vora Vs… — Service and Employment | Gujarat HC (2014)

¶1

C/SCA/6524/2014 JUDGMENT

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

¶3

SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6524 of 2014

¶4

FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:

¶5

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J.DESAI

¶6

=============================================

¶7

1	Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?	No
2	To be referred to the Reporter or not ?	No
3	Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?	No
4	Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ?	No
5	Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?	No

¶8

============================================= MUNAF @ CHACHA @ DOSA @ MAMA S/O SULEMAN VORA....Petitioner(s)

¶9

Versus

¶10

STATE OF GUJARAT & 2....Respondent(s)

¶11

============================================= Appearance:

¶12

MS MITA S PANCHAL, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1

¶13

MS MEGHA CHITALIYA, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1

¶14

=============================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J.DESAI

¶16

Date : 04/09/2014

¶17

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶18

By way of this petition, the detenu has challenged the order of detention dated 02.04.2014 passed by respondent authority, under the provisions of sub-sec (2) of Section 3 of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as “PASA Act”).

¶19

Page 1 of 3

¶20

C/SCA/6524/2014 JUDGMENT

¶21

Learned advocate Ms. Mita S. Panchal appearing for the petitioner-detenu has invited my attention to the order of detention dated 02.04.2014 by which the detenu was arrested. The grounds of detaining the accused are that one offence was registered against the petitioner under the provisions of Section 5, 6(B)(1)(2)(3) and 8 of the Gujarat Animal Preservation Act, 1954 and Section 11(E)(L) of the Animal Cruelty Act and Section 379 of the I.P.C. He is, therefore, a “ cruel person ” as defined under Section 2(bbb) of the PASA Act.

¶22

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner has submitted that, except this solitary offence, there is no material with the detaining authority to detain the petitioner under the provisions of PASA Act. It is submitted that the order is vitiated because only on the basis of one offence registered against the petitioner, and in absence of any other material to show involvement of the petitioner in similar activities, the detaining authority has recorded a subjective satisfaction that the petitioner is a cruel person. The definition of cruel person requires habitual involvement and, therefore, the subjective satisfaction and the consequential order are vitiated.

¶23

Learned AGP Ms. Megha Chitaliya appearing for the State has opposed this petition.

¶24

Having regard to the contentions raised on behalf of the petitioner, it would be necessary to refer to the definition of “cruel person” as given in Section 2(bbb) of the Gujarat Prevention of Antisocial Activities Act, 1985, which runs as under:-

¶25

Page 2 of 3

¶26

C/SCA/6524/2014 JUDGMENT

¶27

“2(bbb) “cruel person” means a person who either by himself or as member or leader of a gang habitually commits or attempts to commit abets the commission of an offence punishable under Section 8 of the Bombay Animal Preservation Act, 1954 (Bom.LXXII of 1954)”.

¶28

It is clear from reading of the definition that the person to be branded as a cruel person has to be either a member or leader of a gang habitually committing or attempting to commit or abetting the commission of offence punishable under Section 8 of the Bombay Animal Preservation Act, 1954. The term “habitually” examined from any angle, literal or legal, would require presence of an element of repetitiveness. In the instant case, barring one offence registered against the petitioner, there was no material before the detaining authority to record a satisfaction that the petitioner is habitual or repetitively involved in the offences.

¶29

Under the circumstances, the subjective satisfaction that the petitioner is a cruel person on the basis of which he has been detained is vitiated.

¶30

It is submitted by the learned advocate for the petitioner that detention order qua co-accused has been quashed by this Court on 22.08.2014.

¶31

In the result, this Special Civil Application is allowed. Order of detention dated 02.04.2014 passed by respondent authority is hereby quashed and set aside. The detenue is ordered to be set at liberty forthwith, if not required in connection with any other case. Rule is made absolute. Direct service is permitted.

¶32

(A.J.DESAI, J.)

¶33

*Kazi...

¶34

Page 3 of 3

Munaf @ Chacha @ Dosa @ Mama S/O Suleman Vora v. State of Gujarat

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Munaf @ Chacha @ Dosa @ Mama S/O Suleman Vora v. State of Gujarat

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pankaj Sendhaji Thakor Vs State of Gujarat

Jitendrasinh Devatsinh Zala Vs State of Gujarat

Shakil Safibhai Pathan Vs State of Gujarat

Jivabhai Ratnabhai Mali Vs State of Gujarat

Dilip @ Dipo Dahyabhai Chunara Vs State of Gujarat

Hemang @ Bhurio Bhikhubhai Karsanbhai Jethva Vs Police Commissioner - Ahmedabad City