This common oral judgment dismisses multiple letters patent appeals and associated civil applications raising objections to a Town Planning Scheme. The High Court found no merit in the appeals and disposed of the underlying civil applications.
The appeals and connected civil applications are dismissed and disposed of with no relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/LPA/1294/2012 JUDGEMNT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1294 of 2012 In SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 58 of 2012 With
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11679 of 2012
In
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1294 of 2012 With
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1295 of 2012
In
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10332 of 2012 With
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12117 of 2012
In
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1295 of 2012 With
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1302 of 2012
In
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18812 of 2011 With
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11786 of 2012 In
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1302 of 2012
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJAY MANOHAR SAHAI and
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.G.SHAH
================================================================
Page 1 of 3
C/LPA/1294/2012 JUDGEMNT
judgment ?
================================================================
JAYANTIBHAI KANJIBHAI PATEL....Appellant(s) Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & 2....Respondent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MR SP MAJMUDAR, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MR NJ SHAH, AGP for the respondent No.1
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJAY MANOHAR SAHAI
and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.G.SHAH
Date : 07/01/2013
COMMON ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJAY MANOHAR SAHAI)
1.We have heard Mr.S.P.Majmudar, learned
advocate for the appellant in all these appeals.
Before the learned single Judge, Town Planning
Scheme itself was challenged by the appellant.
The learned single Judge has disposed of the writ
petition, permitting the appellant to raise
objections before the concerned authorities.
2.It is needles to say that after the
Page 2 of 3
C/LPA/1294/2012 JUDGEMNT
objections raised by the appellant are decided by
the concerned authorities, it shall always be
open for him to challenge the same in appropriate
legal forum.
3.For the aforesaid reasons, we do not find any
merits in the appeals and are accordingly
dismissed.
4.Accordingly, the civil applications also
stand disposed of.
(V.M.SAHAI, J.)
(S.G.SHAH, J.)
(binoy)
Page 3 of 3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeals convicted of the Town Planning Scheme dispute merit allowance.
Whether the civil applications connected to the Town Planning Scheme dispute require disposal.
JAYANTIBHAI KANJIBHAI PATEL
STATE OF GUJARAT
VIJAY MANOHAR SAHAI
S.G. SHAH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court