Dismissed¶25

Pritam Narzary v. the State of Assam and 5 Ors.

Gauhati HC7 May 2026WP(C)/6321/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Pritam Narzary v. State of Assam & 5 Ors.; WP(C)/6321/2022; GAHC010187582022; 2026:GAU-AS:6472; Gauhati High Court; Justice Devashis Baruah; order dated 08.05.2026; writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; petition stated to have become infructuous; Forest Department respondents (Assam); petitioner of Kokrajhar, BTAD, Assam; no statutory provisions or precedents discussed in the order.

What did the court decide?

The Petitioner, being unrepresented and appearing to have lost interest in the proceedings, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. ¶25

Pritam Narzary Vs the State of Assam and 5 Ors. — Gauhati HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010187582022

2026:GAU-AS:6472

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : WP(C)/6321/2022

¶6

PRITAM NARZARY

¶7

S/O SRI BIKASH NARZARY, R/O VILL-DAWAGURI NO. 1, P.O.-GOLADNAGI, P.S.-GOSAIGAON, DIST-KOKRAJHAR, BTAD, ASSAM, PIN-783361

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006, KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM

¶10

2:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST AND HEAD OF FOREST ASSAM REHABARI KAMRUP METRO GUWAHATI-781008

¶11

3:THE ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS (T) LOWER ASSAM ZONE KACHARIGHAT GUWAHATI-781001 KAMRUP METRO ASSAM

¶12

4:THE CONSERVATOR OF FOREST LOWER ASSAM SOCIAL FORESTRY CIRCLE BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN-783380

¶13

5:THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER

¶14

Page No.# 2/3

¶15

AIE VALLEY FOREST DIVISION BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN-783380 6:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN-78338

¶16

For the Petitioner(s) : XXXX

¶17

For the Respondent(s) : Mr. R. R. Gogoi, SC, Forest

¶18

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

¶19

ORDER

¶20

08.05.2026

¶21

None has appeared on behalf of the Petitioner on call. Mr. R. R. Gogoi, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the Forest Department.

¶22

Mr. R. R. Gogoi, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Forest Department informed this Court on 27.04.2026 that the instant writ petition had already become infructuous. Under such circumstances, this Court enquired with the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner as to whether anything further survives in the present proceedings. The learned counsel for the Petitioner as was recorded in the order dated 27.04.2026,

¶23

Page No.# 3/3

¶24

sought for a further opportunity as she had no instruction in the matter.

¶25

Taking into account that the Petitioner is not represented today, it appears that the Petitioner had lost interest in the present proceedings for which the instant writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶26

JUDGE

¶27

Comparing Assistant

Pritam Narzary v. the State of Assam and 5 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pritam Narzary v. the State of Assam and 5 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Motilal Rabidas Vs the State of Assam and Othrs

M/S Win Power Infracon LLP and Ors. Vs Assam Power Distribution Company Limited and Ors.

Traders (Assam) Vs Smt. Kavitha Padmanabhan, I.A.S and 2 Ors.

Bhaskar Bora Vs the State of Assam and 3 Ors.

Jugal Kishore Mahanta Vs the State of Assam and 3 Ors.

Har Kanta Das Vs the State of Assam and 5 Ors.