Dismissed¶43

Icco Pvt. Ltd. v. the State of Assam and Othrs

Gauhati HC15 Jul 2026WP(C)/4889/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petitions before the Gauhati High Court; dismissal on withdrawal with liberty to approach appropriate forum; no-prejudice rider on observations made during proceedings; petitioner ICCO Private Limited (company registered under the Companies Act, 1956) versus State of Assam, Additional Chief Secretary (Industries and Commerce), Assam Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (AIIDC) and its Managing Director; linked matters WP(C)/4889/2025 and I.A.(Civil)/2120/2026; Justice Sanjay Kumar Medhi; order dated 16.07.2026.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to approach the appropriate forum ¶43

Icco Pvt. Ltd. Vs the State of Assam and Othrs — Company and Corporate | Gauhati HC (2026)

Page No.# 1/5

GAHC010020222026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : WP(C)/581/2026

¶6

ICCO PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956REGISTERED OFFICE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI 781021DISTRICT KAMRUP (M), ASSAM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SHRI DHRUBAJYOTI SARMA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, RESIDENT OF PUB SARANIA, GUWAHATI-782003, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER SECRETARY INDUSTRIES COMMERCE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006

¶9

2:THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM

¶10

INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6.

¶11

3:THE ASSAM INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (A GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM UNDERTAKING) INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI-21 DIST. KAMRUP (METRO) ASSAM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

¶12

4:THE MANAGING DIRECTGOR

¶13

Page No.# 2/5

¶14

ASSAM INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (A GOVT.OF ASSAM UNDERTAKING) INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI-21 DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM

¶15

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K SARMA, MR D KALITA,MR H J TAMULI

¶16

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR. S CHAMARIA, SC, AIIDC

¶17

Linked Case : WP(C)/4889/2025

¶18

ICCO PVT LTD A COMPANY DULY REGD. UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956 WITH ITS REGD OFFICE AT THE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI-21 DIST- KAMRUP METRO ASSAM

¶19

REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR DHRUBAJYOTI SARMA

¶20

R/O- PUB- SARANIA GUWAHATI-781003 DIST- KAMRUP METRO ASSAM

¶21

VERSUS

¶22

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE

¶23

BLOCK D DISPUR GUWAHATI-06

¶24

Page No.# 3/5

¶25

2:THE ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE ASSAM SECRETARIAT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 3:THE ASSAM INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELEOPMENT CORPORATION O/O THE AIIDC INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI-21 DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM

¶26

4:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR ASSAM INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

¶27

O/O THE AIIDC INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI-21 DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM -----------Advocate for : MR D CHOUDHURY Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS

¶28

Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/2120/2026

¶29

ICCO PVT LTD A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956REGISTERED OFFICE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI 781021DISTRICT KAMRUP (M) ASSAM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SHRI DHRUBAJYOTI SARMA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS RESIDENT OF PUB SARANIA GUWAHATI-782003 DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM

¶30

VERSUS

¶31

Page No.# 4/5

¶32

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GHY 06 2:THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 3:THE ASSAM INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (A GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM UNDERTAKING) INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI-21 DIST. KAMRUP (METRO) ASSAM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

¶33

4:THE MANAGING DIRECTGOR

¶34

ASSAM INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (A GOVT.OF ASSAM UNDERTAKING) INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI-21 DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. -----------Advocate for : MR. A K SARMA Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS

¶35

Page No.# 5/5

¶36

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI

¶37

ORDER

¶38

16.07.2026

¶39

Heard Shri H.J. Tamuli, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri P. Mahanta, learned counsel and Shri M.M. Zaman, learned Standing Counsel, AIIDC.

¶40

At the outset, Shri H.J. Tamuli, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the brief has been taken back by the client.

¶41

At this stage, Shri P. Mahanta, learned counsel has submitted that he has filed the vakalatnama on behalf of the petitioner. He submits that I.A.(Civil) No. 2120/2026 would not be pressed by him.

¶42

So far as the writ petitionsare concerned, Shri Mahanta, the learned counsel has submitted that he has instructions not to press the same.However, he has sought liberty to approach appropriate forum.

¶43

Writ petitions accordingly stand dismissed on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for.

¶44

It is made clear that since the writ petitions have been withdrawn, any observations made by this Court in the course of the proceedings shall not cause prejudice by either of the parties.

¶45

JUDGE

¶46

Comparing Assistant

Icco Pvt. Ltd. v. the State of Assam and Othrs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Icco Pvt. Ltd. v. the State of Assam and Othrs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bardamal Gpss Ltd. and 22 Ors. Vs the Union of India and 5 Ors.

Mazaharul Hoque Vs the State of Assam and 3 Ors.

Smt. Runu Hazarika Vs the State of Assam and 2 Ors.

Babu Sarma Vs the Government of Assam and 3 Ors.

Icco Pvt. Ltd. Vs the State of Assam and Ors.

Subimal Maity Vs the Management of Maniknagar Tea Estate and Anr.