Dismissed

M/S Bhavya Enterprise and Anr. v. the State Bank of India and 3 Ors.

Gauhati HC1 Sept 2026WP(C)/2322/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for non-prosecution (default dismissal) of writ petitions; no representation on call or on earlier listing dates (02-05-2025, 15-05-2025, 10-02-2026); presumption that petitioners no longer interested; interim order vacated; no adjudication on merits. Gauhati High Court; WP(C)/2322/2018; linked cases WP(C)/2332/2018 and WP(C)/2328/2018; M/s Bhavya Enterprise; M/s Meghalaya Trading Compan

What the court decided

AI extract

M/S Bhavya Enterprise and Anr. Vs the State Bank of India and 3 Ors. — Gauhati HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Page No.# 1/5

GAHC010073622018

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : WP(C)/2322/2018

¶6

M/S BHAVYA ENTERPRISE AND ANR.

¶7

A REGD. PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT HOUSE NO. 90, DR. B BARUAH ROAD, OPPOSITE HOTEL LANDMARK, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI, KAMRUP (M), DIST., ASSAM REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR- SRI GOURAV AGARWAL.

¶8

2: SRI GOURAV AGARWAL

¶9

S/O. LT. O.P. AGARWAL PROPRIETOR OF M/S. BHAVYA ENTERPRISE R/O. FLAT NO. 203 MAINAKUNJ APARTMENT SIKRIA COMPOUND CHRISTIANBASTI GUWAHATI P.S. DISPUR KAMRUP (M) DISTRICT ASSA

¶10

VERSUS

¶11

THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 3 ORS. REP. BY THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, HEAD OFFICE, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, KAMRUP (M) DIST., ASSAM

¶12

2:THE CHIEF MANAGER

¶13

STATE BANK OF INDIA S.M.E. BRANCH G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI KAMRUP METROPOLITAN DISTRICT ASSAM

¶14

Page No.# 2/5

¶15

3:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE

¶16

DISPUR POLICE STATION DISPUR GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) DISTRICT ASSA

¶17

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. H DAS, MR B BORA,MR. V A CHOWDHURY,MR. N J CHOUDHURY,MR. P K MUNIR,MR. M MAHANTA,MR M CHOUDHURY,P BHAGAT

¶18

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR S S SHARMA,MS. L SHARMA,MR. B J MUKHERJEE,MR A CHAKRABORTY

¶19

Linked Case : WP(C)/2332/2018

¶20

M/S MEGHALAYA TRADING COMPANY AND ANR. A REGD. PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT 10TH MILE P.O. BYRNIHAT DIST. RI BHOI MEGHALAYA REP. BY ITS CONSTITUENT AND LAWFUL ATTORNEY SRI GOURAV AGARWAL.

¶21

2: SRI GOURAV AGARWAL

¶22

S/O. LT. O.P. AGARWAL A CONSTITUENT AND LAWFUL ATTORNEY OF M/S. MEGHALAYA TRADING COMPANY R/O. FLAT NO. 203 MAINAKUNJ APARTMENT SIKRIA COMPOUND CHRISTIAN BASTI GUWAHATI P.S. DISPUR KAMRUP (M) DISTRICT ASSAM VERSUS

¶23

THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 2 ORS. REP. BY THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER HEAD OFFICE DISPUR

¶24

Page No.# 3/5

¶25

GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) DIST. ASSAM 2:THE CHIEF MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA S.M.E. BRANCH G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) DIST. ASSAM 3:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE DISPUR POLICE STATION DISPUR GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) DISTRICT ASSAM -----------Advocate for : MR. H DAS Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 2 ORS.

¶26

Linked Case : WP(C)/2328/2018

¶27

M/S W. K. INDUSTRIES AND ANR. A REGD. PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM/INDSTRIAL UNIT HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT 10TH MILES KHANAPARA DIST. RI BHOI MEGHALAYA REP. BY ITS CONSTITUENT AND LAWFUL ATTORNEY SRI GAURAV AGARWAL.

¶28

2: SRI GAURAV AGARWAL

¶29

S/O. LT. O.P. AGARWAL A CONSTITUENT AND LAWFUL ATTORNEY OF M/S. W.K. INDUSTRIES R/O. FLAT NO. 203 MAINAKUNJ APARTMENT SIKRIA COMPOUND CHRISTIAN BASTI GUWAHATI P.S. DISPUR

¶30

Page No.# 4/5

¶31

KAMRUP (M) ASSAM VERSUS

¶32

THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 2 ORS. REP. BY THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER HEAD OFFICE DISPUR GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) DISTRICT ASSAM 2:THE CHIEF MANAGER

¶33

STATE BANK OF INDIA S.M.E. BRANCH G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) DIST. ASSAM

¶34

3:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE

¶35

DISPUR POLICE STATION DISPUR GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) DIST. ASSAM -----------Advocate for : MR. H DAS Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 2 ORS.

¶36

BEFORE

¶37

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR

¶38

ORDER

¶39

Date : 12-02-2026

¶40

None appears for the petitioner on call.

¶41

There was no representation even on the earlier dates of listing, i.e. on 02-052025, 15-05-2025 and 10-02-2026.

¶42

Page No.# 5/5

¶43

In view of the above, this Court would presume that the petitioners are no longer

¶44

interested to pursue the matters any further. Accordingly, the above noted writ petitions

¶45

stand dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶46

Interim order passed earlier stands vacated.

¶47

JUDGE

¶48

Comparing Assistant

M/S Bhavya Enterprise and Anr. v. the State Bank of India and 3 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

M/S Bhavya Enterprise and Anr. v. the State Bank of India and 3 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases