Dr Mai Kuru Camder v. The Nerist and 5 Ors.

Gauhati HC6 May 2026IA(C)/97/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Short procedural order: impleadment allowed in WP (C) 194 (AP) 2026. Keywords: interlocutory application, IA(C)/97/2026, impleadment of party respondent, unopposed prayer allowed, Smti Toko Yajur impleaded as respondent No. 6, applicant Dr Mai Kuru Camder, NERIST Nirjuli Arunachal Pradesh, Fact Finding Committee, Gauhati High Court Itanagar Bench, Budi Habung, J., order dated 07.05.2026. No statute or precedent cited; no quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

Impleadment of Smti. Toko Yajur as party respondent No. 6 in WP (C) 194 (AP) 2026. ¶¶24

Dr Mai Kuru Camder Vs The Nerist and 5 Ors. — Gauhati HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Page No.# 1/3

¶2

GAHC040006412026

¶3

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)

¶4

Case No. : IA(C)/97/2026

¶5

Dr Mai Kuru Camder

¶6

Son of Late Mai Tar, permanent resident of Village Mai, Keyi Panyor District, Arunachal Pradesh.

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

The NERIST and 5 Ors represented by its Board of Management, Nrijuli, Arunachal Pradesh 791109 2:The Chairman

¶9

Age: 0 Occupation : Board of Management NERIST Nirjuli Arunachal Pradesh 791109

¶10

3:The Fact Finding Committee Age: 0 Occupation : represented by its members namely Prof (Mrs) M.A.Choudhuri NIT Nagpur Maharashtra and Dr S Goverdhan Rao former Registrar NIT Warangal Andhra Pradesh notice to be served through the Director NERIST Nirjuli Arunachal Pradesh 791109

¶11

Page No.# 2/3

¶12

4:The Director Age: 0 Occupation : NERIST Nirjuli Arunachal Pradesh 791109 5:Prof Narendranath S Age: 0 Occupation : Director NERIST Nirjuli Arunachal Pradesh 791109 6:Smti Toko Yajur Age: 0 Occupation : Wife of Shri Mai Kuru Camder resident of Nirjuli Village-I PO and PS Nirjuli Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh

¶13

Advocate for the Petitioner : Marge Doji,

¶14

Advocate for the Respondent : Nani Anju, S/C NERIST

¶15

-BEFORE

¶16

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG

¶17

ORDER

¶18

07.05.2026

¶19

Heard Mr. B. Kausik, learned counsel for the applicant; Ms. N. Anju, learned Standing Counsel, NERIST for respondent Nos. 1 to 3; Mr. J. Jini, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 4 & 5 and Mr. D. Mazumdar, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. K. Tama, learned counsel for respondent No. 6.

¶20

Page No.# 3/3

¶21

By filing this Interlocutory Application, the applicant has prayed for impleadment of Smti. Toko Yajur as party respondent No. 6 in WP (C) 194 (AP) 2026.

¶22

The prayer having not objected to by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents is allowed.

¶23

Accordingly, Smti. Toko Yajur is impleaded as party respondent Nos. 6 in WP (C) 194 (AP) 2026.

¶24

With the above, this Interlocutory Application stands allowed and disposed of.

¶25

JUDGE

¶26

Comparing Assistant

Dr Mai Kuru Camder v. The Nerist and 5 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr Mai Kuru Camder v. The Nerist and 5 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Teli Rontu Camdir Vs The State of Ap and 2 Ors.

Niglar Veo Vs The State of Ap and 5 Ors.

Ogom Tayeng Vs The State of Ap and 2 Ors.

Bodhisatta Chakma and 17 Ors. Vs The State of Ap and 6 Ors.

Koruna Sindhu Chakma and 129 Ors. Vs The State of Ap and 6 Ors.

Koruna Sindhu Chakma and 129 Ors. Vs The State of Ap and 5 Ors.