Ubaid Ullah Khan v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
Clerical/typographical-error correction in a criminal interlocutory application (I.A.(Crl.)) before the Gauhati High Court: a 2026 batch of bail applications (including Bail Appln./1180/2026 of Rahena Begum) was wrongly typed as 'disposed of' despite referral to be placed before the Hon'ble Chief Justice for a larger Bench; the error was corrected so that the petitions remain pending, with interim-bail prayers renewable before the larger Bench, and the correcting order merged with the common order dated 02.07.2026. Relevant for issues of correction of orders, pendency versus disposal of bail petitions, and larger-Bench references.
What did the court decide?
Interlocutory application allowed and disposed of: typographical error in the common order dated 02.07.2026 corrected; the batch of bail petitions declared not disposed of and remaining pending till consideration by a larger Bench, if any; correcting order to be read as part of the common order dated 02.07.2026 and placed before the Joint Registrar (Judicial) for information.