This contempt petition alleged willful violation of a previous order. The respondent filed an affidavit showing compliance. The court held the petition closed and clarified the petitioner's right to assail the impugned order.
Contempt petition stands closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010159232025
2026:GAU-AS:12892
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/381/2025
SABHA RAM BASUMATARY S/O LT SANTIRAM BASUMATARY VILL- DOBOKA BHAGIRAM GAON P.O. AND DIST- DOBOKA DIST- HOJAI (ASSAM)
2: JAYTUN NESSA W/O ALA UDDIN LASKAR VILL- DOBOKA BHAGIRAM GAON P.O. AND DIST- DOBOKA DIST- HOJAI (ASSAM) VERSUS
BIDYUT BIKASH BHAGAWATI DISTRICT COMMISSIONER HOJAI (ASSAM) PIN-782435
-----------Advocate for : MR H R A CHOUDHURY Advocate for : MR. J HANDIQUE appearing for BIDYUT BIKASH BHAGAWATI
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
ORDER
Date : 07.09.2026
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate appearing for the respondent.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition stands appropriate when the impugned order has been complied with.
SABHA RAM BASUMATARY S/O LT SANTIRAM BASUMATARY 2: JAYTUN NESSA W/O ALA UDDIN LASKAR
BIDYUT BIKASH BHAGAWATI DISTRICT COMMISSIONER HOJAI (ASSAM)
Arun Dev Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
