Contempt petition where petitioner's counsel stated the underlying order had been complied with and no violation remained. The High Court closed the contempt case as complied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010092862022
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/274/2022
MRINMOY KUMAR DAWKA
S/O- LATE SANTOSH DAWKA, R/O- VILL.- RANGMAHAL, P.S. CHANGSARI, DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN- 781030.
VERSUS
DIGANTA BORAH AND ANR
COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6.
2:SMTI. BARNALI SARMA INSPECTOR GENERAL PRISONS ASSAM ASSAM PRISONS HEADQUARTERS KHANAPARA GHY-22
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D CHOUDHURY, MR T CHAKRABORTY
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D NATH,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
ORDER
04.02.2026
Ms. A. Kharbani, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. T. Chakraborty, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in this case, the order has been complied with and there remains no violation as on today.
Ms. M. Barman, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. D. Nath, learned
Page No.# 2/2
counsel for the respondents is present.
Accordingly, the contempt case is closed as complied.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Mrinmoy Kumar Dawka
Diganta Borah
Smti. Barnali Sarma
Rajesh Mazumdar
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
