This single-paragraph order by a Gauhati High Court bench rejects an anticipatory bail petition, holding that the petitioner does not deserve the privilege at this stage of the investigation based on a consideration of available material.
The anticipatory bail petition is rejected at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010038492026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/407/2026
SAMIRAN TALUKDAR
S/O-DHANANJAY TALUKDAR,VILL-BHAWANIPUR, P.O- BHAWANIPUR, P.S.AND DIST.-BARPETA,ASSAM, PIN-781352
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M BARMAN, MR P H KONWAR,P BURAGOHAIN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
ORDER
Date : 16.03.2026
Heard Mr. M. Barman, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K.K. Parasar, learned Addl. P.P. for the State.
The CD is available. Going through the materials of the CD, this Court is of the opinion, that the
Page No.# 2/2
petitioner does not deserve the privilege of anticipatory bail at this stage of the investigation.
Accordingly, the anticipatory bail petition is rejected at this Stage.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner deserves the privilege of anticipatory bail at this stage of the investigation.
Samiran Talukdar
The State of Assam
Rajesh Mazumdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
