Allowed

Salim Uddin v. the State of Assam

Gauhati HC15 Mar 2026AB/354/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 BNSS by the betel-nut owner and truck owner arrested in an NDPS case. The FSL report showed no narcotic or psychotropic substances in the samples. The High Court allowed both applications and granted bail on bonds with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on bond of Rs.10,000 each with one surety of like amount, with conditions of no tampering, cooperation with investigation, and no contact with informant/witnesses.

Salim Uddin Vs the State of Assam — Narcotics (NDPS) | Gauhati HC (2026)

Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010032222026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : AB/354/2026

¶6

SALIM UDDIN

¶7

S/O AJIJUR RAHAMAN, R/O VILL BOROITOLI PART I, PS KATIGORAH, DIST CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN 788001

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

THE STATE OF ASSAM

¶10

TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM

¶11

Advocate for the Petitioner : TAWHID LASKAR, SHAHANAWAZ CHOWDHURY,ASHRAFUL BORBHUYAN,MR. D K AGARWALA

¶12

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,

¶13

Linked Case : AB/424/2026

¶14

JAHED IKBAL S/O ISLAM UDDIN R/O VILL JAGADISHPUR PART V PS KATIGORAH DIST CACHAR ASSAM PIN 788805

¶15

VERSUS

¶16

Page No.# 2/3

¶17

THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ASSAM

¶18

-----------Advocate for : TAWHID LASKAR Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM

¶19

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR

¶20

ORDER

¶21

Date : 16.03.2026

¶22

Heard Mr. Tawhid Laskar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. S.H. Borah, learned Addl. P.P for the State. The petitioner in AB/354/2026 is the owner of the betel-nut which was being carried in the truck involved in the incident, while the petitioner in AB/424/2026 is the owner of the truck.

¶23

This is an application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 praying for the grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners.

¶24

The FSL report revealed that no narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances were detected in the samples sent for forensic test.

¶25

Accordingly, these anticipatory bail petitions in respect of Salim Uddin , Son of Ajijur Rahaman, and Jahed Ikbal, Son of Islam Uddin, are allowed. In the event of the arrest of the petitioners in connection with Lanka P.S. Case 265/ 2025 registered under Sections 21 (C)/ 29/ 27 A of NDPS Act, the petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- each along with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating Authority of aforesaid case, subject to the following conditions:

¶26

(i) That the accused/applicants shall not hamper or tamper with the evidence of the instant case in any manner; and

¶27

(ii) That the accused/applicants shall fully cooperate with the investigation of the case

¶28

Page No.# 3/3

¶29

by appearing before the I.O of the case, as and when call for by the I.O.

¶30

(iii) That the accused/applicants will not try to establish communication with informant and/or witnesses in any manner whatsoever.

¶31

JUDGE

¶32

Comparing Assistant

Salim Uddin v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Salim Uddin v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs Bina Bhakta and 5 Ors.

Abdul Salam Vs Ali Hussain and Anr.

Purnima Saikia Vs Diganta Sarma and Anr.

Jahed Ikbal Vs the State of Assam

Kamrul Islam and Anr. Vs the State of Assam

Samiran Talukdar Vs the State of Assam