Bikram Paul v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application became infructuous after the petitioner was granted regular bail and chargesheets were filed in both registered cases; the court closed the application.
Anticipatory bail application became infructuous after the petitioner was granted regular bail and chargesheets were filed in both registered cases; the court closed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/1
GAHC010098812026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1040/2026
BIKRAM PAUL
S/O- PARIMAL PAUL RESIDENT OF- SONAI ROAD, SARATPALLY W/NO14,P.O.-SILCHAR P.S.-SILCHAR DIST.-CACHAR, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR N A MAZARBHUIYA, MR N Z CHOUDHURY
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
ORDER
Date : 05.06.2026
The Officer in Charge, Silchar Police Station has reported that two cases were registered against the present petitioner and both the cases are already chargesheeted.
Mr. N A Mazarbhuiya, learned counsel representing the petitioner has submitted that in both the cases the petitioner has been granted regular bail.
In view of the above, the present bail application has become infructuous and, therefore, the same stands closed and disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Bikram Paul
The State of Assam
Parthivjyoti Saikia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court