Applicants sought pre-arrest bail under Section 482 BNSS in a Chapor PS case under several BNS sections. Having already appeared before the investigating officer pursuant to an interim bail order, the interim pre-arrest bail was made absolute on same terms and the application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010098052026
2026:GAU-AS:8181
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1038/2026
ANOWAR ZAMAN S/O LT KASHEM ALI,
RESIDENT OF VILL KOTHALGURI, PS CHAPOR, DIST DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN 783349
2: ABU BAKKAR ALI ALIAS ABU BAKKAR SIDDIQUE SO LT KASHEM ALI RO VILL KOTHALGURI PS CHAPOR DIST DHUBRI ASSAM PIN 783349
3: AYNAL ALIAS AINAL HOQUE SO LT KASHEM ALI RESIDENT OF VILL KOTHALGURI PS CHAPOR DIST DHUBRI ASSAM PIN 783349
4: OMOR ALIAS AMAR ALIAS AMOR FARUK RESIDENT OF VILL KOTHALGURI PS CHAPOR DIST DHUBRI ASSAM PIN 78334
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM
Page No.# 2/3
Advocate for the Petitioner : S S AHMED,
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA
ORDER
Date : 10.06.2026
Heard Mr. S.S. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the accused/ applicants.
Also heard Mr. K.K Das, learned APP for the State.
This is an application under Section 482 of the BNSS,2023 praying for granting of pre-arrest bail to the accused/ applicants, namely 1. Anowar Zaman, 2. Abu Bakkar Ali @ Abu Bakkar Siddique, 3. Aynal @ Ainal Hoque and, 4. Omor @ Amar @ Amor Faruk, in connection with Chapor P.S. Case No.41/2026 under Sections 191(2)/ 126(2)/ 127(2)/ 118(2)/ 3(5) of the BNS,2023.
An FIR was lodged on 16.04.2026, alleging a quarrel with an altercation took place between the family of the informant and the accused persons whereby the accused persons inflicted severe injuries on the family members of the informant.
A co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 20.05.2026 has granted interim pre-arrest bail to the accused/ applicants with the condition that the accused/ applicants shall appear before the investigating officer within 7 (seven) days.
The learned counsel for the accused/ applicants submits that in terms of
Page No.# 3/3
the aforesaid order dated 20.05.2026, the accused/ applicants have already appeared before the investigating officer and got their statements recorded.
The aforesaid fact was confirmed by the learned APP appearing for the State.
Taking into account the aforesaid facts this Court is of the considered opinion that the interim pre-arrest bail order dated 20.05.2026 should be made absolute.
Accordingly, the interim pre-arrest bail granted to the accused/ applicants vide order 20.05.2026 is made absolute with same terms and conditions as stated therein.
In above terms the instant AB application is disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether interim pre-arrest bail granted to the accused applicants should be made absolute after they complied with the condition of appearing before the investigating officer.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Anowar Zaman
Abu Bakkar Ali @ Abu Bakkar Siddique
Aynal @ Ainal Hoque
Omor @ Amar @ Amor Faruk
The State of Assam
Anjan Moni Kalita
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
