Petitioner withdrew the writ petition on the ground that the matter had become infructuous. The court allowed the prayer and dismissed the writ petition on withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC040018292024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/462/2024
M/s JJ Enterprise Age: 0 Occupation : Address:represented by its proprietor Shri Kipa Rokio Son of Kipa Tatup resident of 6 Kilo Itanagar PO and PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP and 6 Ors Age: 0 Occupation : Address:represented by the Secretary RWD cum Chief Executive Officer (ARRDA) Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 2:The Chief Engineer (PMGSY) Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar.
3:The Supdt Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Rural Work Circle (RWC) Rupa West Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh.
Page No.# 2/3
4:The Executive Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Bameng RWD Division Bameng East Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh. 5:The Chairman Age: 0 Occupation : Address:The Bid Evaluation Committee RWC Rupa West Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh. 6:M/s Capital Enterprise Age: 0 Occupation : Address:represented by its proprietor Smti Senbom Taipodia wife of Shri Dayanand Thakur resident of C Sector Naharlagun PO and PS Naharlagun Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 7:M/s Yana Enterprise Age: 0 Occupation : Address:represented by its proprietor Shri Lama Bagang Son of Late Kache Bagang resident of Gohpur PO RK Mission PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. -----------Advocate for : Nending Kago Advocate for : Gimi Tarak appearing for The State of AP and 6 Ors: Advocate , , , ,
Page No.# 3/3
, , appearing for 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, respectively.
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
ORDER
Date : 03.04.2025
On instructions, Mr. M. Tama, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. N. Kago, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous and therefore, he has instructions to withdraw the writ petition.
The respondents are represented.
Prayer is allowed.
The matter stands dismissed on withdrawal.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
M/s JJ Enterprise
The State of AP
The Chief Engineer (PMGSY)
The Supdt Engineer
The Executive Engineer
The Chairman
Kalyan Rai Surana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
