The petitioner sought permission to withdraw a writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one. The court allowed the prayer for withdrawal.
Liberty to file a fresh petition granted upon withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040009152024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/288/2024
Singtung Yorpen
Son of Taba Yorpen, Village Karle, Po and PS Monigong, Shi Yomi District, Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS
The STate of AP and Anr through the Commissioner/ Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar 2:The Director of Elementary Education
Age: 0 Occupation : Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanaga
Advocate for the Petitioner : Rage koyu, Likha Tabin
Advocate for the Respondent : Taba Tagum, SC (Education)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
ORDER
Date : 10.01.2025
Mr. L. Tabin, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to file a fresh.
Prayer for withdrawal is allowed.
Page No.# 2/2
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal with a
liberty, as prayed for.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Singtung Yorpen
State of Arunachal Pradesh
Director of Elementary Education
Kardak Ete
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
