Dismissed¶22

Sashi Das v. the State of Assam and 4 Ors.

Gauhati HC13 Oct 2025WP(C)/2544/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition with liberty; Gauhati High Court; Justice Manish Choudhury; Order dated 14.10.2025; WP(C)/2544/2022; petitioner Sashi Das (North Lakhimpur, Lakhimpur, Assam); respondents: State of Assam Finance (Taxation) Department, Commissioner of Taxes, Assistant Commissioner of Taxes Guwahati Unit C, Tamal Bose and Tapan Kumar Baishya (Junior Asstt.-cum-Typists); dismissed on withdrawal; no objection by respondent-side counsel; registry ID GAHC010068682022.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed on withdrawal at the petitioner's request, with liberty as prayed for; no adjudication on merits. ¶22

Sashi Das Vs the State of Assam and 4 Ors. — Gauhati HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010068682022

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : WP(C)/2544/2022

¶6

SASHI DAS

¶7

S/O LATE KANOW CHANDRA DAS, R/O KAPAHOWA, P.O. ANGERKHOWA CHARIALI, PIN- 787031, P.S. NORTH LAKHIMPUR, DIST.- LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM.

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, FINANCE (TAXATION) DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY.- 781006.

¶10

2:THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXES KAR BHAWAN DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006.

¶11

3:THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF TAXES GUWAHATI UNIT C KAR BHAWAN DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006. 4:TAMAL BOSE S/O- SITESH BOSE JUNIOR ASSTT.-CUM-TYPIST OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF TAXES UNIT C KAR BHAWAN DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006.

¶12

Page No.# 2/3

¶13

5:TAPAN KUMAR BAISHYA S/O- LATE RAJENDRA NATH BAISHYA JUNIOR ASSTT.-CUM-TYPIST OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF TAXES UNIT C KAR BHAWAN DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006

¶14

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J PATOWARY, MR D K ROY

¶15

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FINANCE AND TAXATION, MR. M P SARMA (r-5),MRS. S P NAIR (r-5),MR. A BORO (r-5),MR A CHAKRABORTY (r-5),MS S SARMA HAZARIKA (r-5),MR. U K NAIR (r-5),MS P SARMAH,MR. D NANDI

¶16

BEFORE

¶17

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

¶18

ORDER

¶19

Date : 14.10.2025

¶20

Mr. D.K. Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as the respondent authorities are contemplating to take a decision in favour of the petitioner, the petitioner does not want to proceed further with the writ petition, at this stage, and therefore, wants to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty.

¶21

Ms. P. Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 and Mr. M.P. Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent no. 5 are present and have submitted that they have no objection to the prayer so made.

¶22

In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as prayed for.

¶23

JUDGE

¶24

Page No.# 3/3

¶25

Comparing Assistant

Sashi Das v. the State of Assam and 4 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sashi Das v. the State of Assam and 4 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arjun Thapa Vs the Union of India and 2 Ors.

Dr. Mokshyada Prasad Borthakur and Anr. Vs the State of Assam and 2 Ors.

Smti Pranita Swargiary Vs Oil India Limited and 4 Ors.

Dhrubajyoti Deb Vs the State of Assam and Anr.

Amiya Kumar Roy Vs the Chairman and Ors.

Sultan Hussain Talukdar Vs the State of Assam and 4 Ors.