Bharti Axa Life Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rina Kalita and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Gauhati High Court review petition Review.Pet./225/2025, decided 03.09.2025 by Justice Kardak Ete. Bharti AXA Life Insurance Co. Ltd. (counsel C. Talukdar, G. Swami, S. Bora) obtained correction of a typographical error in the order dated 12.03.2025 in WP(C) No. 300/2024: “has accepted” substituted by “is expected” regarding honouring the Insurance Ombudsman's decision (Ombudsman office, Panbazar, Guwahati; respondents Rina Kalita and the Insurance Ombudsman; respondent counsel A. Mannaf raised no objection). Correcting order to be read as part of the order dated 12.03.2025. Statutorily referenced: Companies Act 1956, Insurance Act 1938.
What did the court decide?
Typographical correction allowed: the words “has accepted” substituted by “is expected” in the 3rd and last paragraph of the order dated 12.03.2025 in WP(C) No. 300/2024, with the correcting order to be read as part of that order.