Disposed¶31

Debia Tama v. The State of Ap and 6 Ors.

Gauhati HC9 Sept 2025IA(C)/80/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Debia Tama v. The State of AP and 6 Ors (Ha Tatu, respondent No. 7); Gauhati High Court, Itanagar Bench; IA(C)/80/2025; linked WP(C)/115/2025; Nelson Sailo; 10.09.2025; amicable settlement outside Court; writ petition and I.A. closed as not pressed; interim order passed earlier vacated; advocates: Tayum Son (petitioner), T. Tagum (SC, Health Department), T. Taba (respondent No. 7), R. Basar (Government Advocate).

What did the court decide?

The parties having reached an amicable settlement outside the Court and the petitioner electing not to pursue the matter, the writ petition as well as the I.A. stand closed, as not pressed. ¶31

Debia Tama Vs The State of Ap and 6 Ors. — Gauhati HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Page No.# 1/5

¶2

GAHC040004362025

¶3

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)

¶4

Case No. : IA(C)/80/2025

¶5

Debia Tama

¶6

Son of Late Debia Tedi, permanent resident of Radhpu Village, PO Deed, PS Yachuli/ Ziro, Keyi Panyor District, Arunachal Pradesh presently residing at Midphu Village, PO and PS Doimukh, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh 791112

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

The State of AP and 6 Ors

¶9

represented by the Secretary, Land Management, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Civil Secretariat, Itanagar, PO Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh 791111

¶10

2:The Secretary Age: 0 Occupation : Department of Health and Family Welfare Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Civil Secretariat Itanagar PO Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh 791111

¶11

3:The Director Age: 0 Occupation : Department of Health and Family Welfare Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Naharlagun PO Naharlagun Arunachal Pradesh 791110

¶12

4:The Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation :

¶13

Page No.# 2/5

¶14

Papum Pare District Yupia PO Doimukh Arunachal Pradesh 791112 5:The Estate Officer Age: 0 Occupation : Papum Pare District Yupia PO Doimukh Arunachal Pradesh 791112 6:The District Land Revenue and Settlement Officer Age: 0 Occupation : Papum Pare District Yupia PO Doimukh Arunachal Pradesh 791112 7:Ha Tatu Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Late Ha Tame proprietor of M/s Kange Construction Itanagar Jullang Village PO RK Mission Hospital Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh

¶15

Advocate for the Petitioner : Tayum Son,

¶16

Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), SC (Land Management),SC (Health and Family),Taba Tagum

¶17

Linked Case : WP(C)/115/2025

¶18

Debia Tama Age: 30 Occupation :

¶19

Page No.# 3/5

¶20

Address:Son of Late Debia Tedi permanent resident of Radhpu Village PO Deed PS Yachuli/ Ziro Keyi Panyor District Arunachal Pradesh presently residing at Midphu Village PO and PS Doimukh Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh 791112 VERSUS The State of AP and 6 Ors Age: 0 Occupation : Address:represented by the Secretary Land Management Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Civil Secretariat Itanagar PO Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh 791111 2:The Secretary Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Department of Health and Family Welfare Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Civil Secretariat Itanagar PO Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh 791111 3:The Director Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Department of Health and Family Welfare Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Naharlagun PO Naharlagun Arunachal Pradesh 791110 4:The Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Papum Pare District Yupia PO Doimukh

¶21

Page No.# 4/5

¶22

Arunachal Pradesh 791112 5:The Estate Officer Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Papum Pare District Yupia PO Doimukh Arunachal Pradesh 791112 6:The District Land Revenue and Settlement Officer Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Papum Pare District Yupia PO Doimukh Arunachal Pradesh 791112 7:Ha Tatu Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Son of Late Ha Tame proprietor of M/s Kange Construction Itanagar Jullang Village PO RK Mission Hospital Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. -----------Advocate for : Tayum Son Advocate for : GA (AP) appearing for The State of AP and 6 Ors: Advocate , , , , , , appearing for 2, 3, 4, 5,

Page No.# 5/5

7, respectively.

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO

¶27

ORDER

¶28

Date : 10.09.2025

¶29

Mr. T. Son, learned counsel for the petitioner/applicant submits that the parties have reached to an amicable settlement outside this Court and therefore, the petitioner would not like to pursue the matter.

¶30

Mr. T. Tagum, learned Standing Counsel, Health Department; Mr. T. Taba, learned counsel for the respondent No. 7 and Ms. R. Basar, learned Government Advocate, agreed to the submission made by the Mr. T. Son, learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶31

In view of above, the writ petition as well as the I.A. stands closed, as not pressed.

¶32

Needless to say, interim order, passed earlier shall stand vacated.

¶33

JUDGE

¶34

Comparing Assistant

Debia Tama v. The State of Ap and 6 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Debia Tama v. The State of Ap and 6 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smti.Phefot Baham Vs The State of Ap and 3 Others

M/s United Pisa Construction and Anr. Vs The State of Ap and 6 Ors.

M/s Sera Agency and Anr. Vs The State of Ap and 7 Ors.

Smti Lokam Yame Vs The State of Ap and 5 Ors.

Kime Kaing Vs The Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission and 2 Ors.

M/s North India Engineering Vs The State of Ap and 4 Ors.