Writ petition concerning a Block Development Officer's posting was withdrawn by the petitioner at counsel's instruction; respondents raised no objection and the court disposed of the petition as withdrawn, preserving liberty to seek fresh legal recourse.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040003392021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/98/2021
Smti.Phefot Baham W/O SHRI AJAY MURTEM, PRESENTLY SERVING AS BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER (INCHARGE), NAMSANG CD BLOCK, DEOMALI, PO/PS DEOMALI, DIST. TIRAP, AP.
VERSUS
The State of AP and 3 Others REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY/COMMISSIONER, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF AP, ITANAGAR. 2:THE DIRECTOR Age: 0 Occupation : RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF AP ITANAGAR. 3:SHRI KAPA RAI Age: 0 Occupation : PRESENTLY SERVING AS BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER (OFFICIATING) YUPIA PAPUM PARE DIST. AP. 4:SHRI TASAR DEBIA Age: 0 Occupation : PRESENTLY SERVING AS BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER (OFFICIATING) ZIRO LOWER SUBANSIRI DIST. AP
Advocate for the Petitioner : Rintu Saikia, Ligam Nochi,Hongmo Ete,Limi Bam,Bomchi Taipodia,Idak Bam
Advocate for the Respondent : Binter Picha, SC (RD),Damin Taggu,D Riba,Nikita Danggen,Oken
Page No.# 2/2
Duggong,Oyina Perme,Tate Tatak,K Chotton,Y Dagiam,P Siga,Lissing Perme,Krishna Dubey,Hero Tayo,William Yirang,Wintet Sawin,A Perme,T Gamlin,Signal Yirang
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO
O R D E R
08.09.2025
Mr. Idak Bam, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions to withdraw the writ petition.
Ms. N. Danggen, learned counsel appears for respondent No.4 and Mr. S. Tapin, learned Senior Government Advocate appears for official respondents and they submit that they have no objection to the prayer.
In view of above, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
It is also provided herein that if fresh cause of action arises, the petitioner will be at liberty to approach this Court as may be permissible in law.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Smti. Phefot Baham
The State of AP (represented by Secretary/Commissioner, Rural Development Department)
The Director, Rural Development Department
Shri Kapa Rai
Shri Tasar Debia
Nelson Sailo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
