Md. Mazaharul Sultan Vs the State of Assam and Anr.

2:ROUFUL ISLAM S/O LATE SUKUR ALI AHMED S.I. OF POLICE MAHABHOIRAB POLICE STATION UNDER TEZPUR POLICE STATION P.S.-TEZPUR DIST-SONITPUR ASSAM PIN-78402

¶11

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P MAHANTA, MS. P SAHARIA

¶12

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,

¶13

Linked Case : Crl.Pet./538/2020

¶14

MD. MAZAHARUL SULTAN S/O LATE RUSTAM ALI R/O BHITORSUTI P.O.-KALIABHOMORA

¶15

Page No.# 2/5

¶16

P.S.-TEZPUR DIST-SONITPUR ASSAM PIN-784027

¶17

VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ASSAM 2:ROUFUL ISLAM S/O LATE SUKUR ALI AHMED S.I. OF POLICE MAHABHOIRAB POLICE STATION UNDER TEZPUR POLICE STATION P.S.-TEZPUR DIST-SONITPUR ASSAM PIN-784027 -----------Advocate for : MR. P MAHANTA Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

¶18

:: PRESENT ::

¶19

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA

¶20

For the Petitioners: Mr. P. Mahanta, Advocate . For the Respondent: Mr. K.K. Parasar, Addl. P.P., Assam. Date of Hearing : 12.06.2025. Date of Judgment : 05.08.2025.

¶21

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (CAV)

¶22

Heard Mr. P. Mahanta, the counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K.K. Parasar, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam.

¶23

Page No.# 3/5

¶24

2. The Criminal Petition No.538/2020 was filed praying for quashing the FIR relating to Tezpur P.S. Case No.1674/2020. During pendency of this criminal petition, police filed the charge sheet. Therefore, the Criminal Petition No.8/2023 was filed praying for quashing the charge sheet in respect of PR Case No.1058/2022 pending in the court of the Judicial Magistrate at Tezpur. Therefore, both the cases are taken up for disposal as both arise out of the same FIR.

¶25

3. One woman named Mrs. Rahila Begum had lodged an FIR before police alleging, inter alia, that the present petitioner Dr. Mazaharul Sultan insisted upon her, to take treatment in his clinic. There were some other allegations against some other persons in the said FIR. The informant Mrs. Rahila Begum alleged that the present petitioner along with some other persons had ruined her life. On the basis of the said FIR, police registered the Tezpur P.S. Case No.1506/2020.

¶26

4. During investigation of the said case, the Investigating Officer (the Respondent No.2) found that Dr. Mazaharul Sultan was running a medical clinic on the basis of some forged and fake certificates because the said petitioner could not produce any legal documents in support of his profession. The Respondent No.2 alleged that the petitioner Dr. Mazaharul Sultan was running a small hospital with facilities to keep patients. According to the Respondent No.2, the petitioner Dr. Mazaharul Sultan was running that business on the basis of forged documents. The petitioner Dr. Mazaharul Sultan was allegedly pretending to be an MBBS doctor.

¶27

5. The learned counsel Mr. Mahanta confined his arguments within the provisions of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. Mr. Mahanta submitted that Section 32 of the said Act of 1940 prescribes that no prosecution shall be instituted except by an Inspector or any Gazetted Officer of the Central Government or a State Government authorized in writing in this behalf by the Central Government or a State Government by a general or Special Order made in this behalf by that Government or the person aggrieved or a recognized consumer association. Section 21 of the said Act defines the word

¶28

Page No.# 4/5

¶29

Inspectors as mentioned in Section 32. According to Mr. Mahanta, a Sub-Inspector of Police is not within the meaning of the word “Inspector” as mentioned in Section 21 of the said Act of 1940.

¶30

6. The learned counsel Mr. Parasar has submitted that in this case Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 is not applicable. According to Mr. Parasar, this Act applies to import, manufacture, distribution and sale of drugs and cosmetics.

¶31

7. I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel of both sides.

¶32

8. At this stage, let us go through the preamble of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. It reads as under:

¶33

“An Act to regulate the import, manufacture, distribution and sale of drugs [and cosmetics].

¶34

WHEREAS it is expedient to regulate the [import, manufacture, distribution and sale] of drugs [and cosmetics];

¶35

AND WHEREAS the Legislatures of all the Provinces have passed resolutions in terms of Section 103 of the Government of India Act, 1935 (26 Geo. 5, c. 2), in relation to such of the above-mentioned matters and matters ancillary thereto as are enumerated in List II of the Seventh Schedule to the said Act:”

¶36

9. The Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 was amended in the year 1982. The statement of objects and reasons of amending the Act of 1940 says that Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 regulates the import into, manufacture, distribution and sale of drugs and cosmetics in the country. The problems of adulteration of drugs and also of production of spurious and substandard drugs are posing serious threat to the health of the community. It is, therefore, considered necessary to amend the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, so as to impose more stringent penalties on the anti social elements indulging in the manufacture or sale of adulterated or spurious drugs or drugs not of standard quality which are likely to cause death or grievous hurt to the user. This opportunity is also being availed of to incorporate certain other provisions on the other

¶37

Page No.# 5/5

¶38

aspects of effective control of manufacture, distribution, sale of drugs and cosmetics on the basis of experience gained in the working of the Act.

¶39

10. The statute Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 regulates the import, manufacture, distribution and sale of drugs in our country. The allegation brought against the petitioner Dr. Mazaharul Sultan is that he was running a mini hospital without having necessary qualification required for a doctor.

¶40

11. It may be mentioned that on a prior occasion, that is on 19^th September, 2011, the Joint Director of Health Services, Sonitpur, Tezpur directed the petitioner Dr. Mazaharul Sultan to close down his clinic immediately on the ground that he did not have the permission from the competent authority to run his clinic. Therefore, the petitioner Dr. Mazaharul Sultan filed a suit being Title Suit No.78/2011 in the court of the Munsiff No.2, Tezpur, Sonitpur against the Joint Director of Health Service, Sonitpur. The learned Munsiff by the judgment dated 18.06.2018 passed a judgment and allowed the petitioner Dr. Mazaharul Sultan to run the clinic by practising medicine in alternative medicine system and debarred him from prescribing allopathic medicine.

¶41

12. In this case, the view taken by the learned Munsiff No.2 is not relevant. The allegation brought against the petitioner Dr. Mazaharul Sultan is that without having an MBBS degree, he was treating patients in his hospital. Police filed the charge sheet under Sections 420/467/468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 15 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956. This Court is of the opinion that under the given circumstances the prosecution should be given an opportunity to prove the allegation against the petitioner Dr. Mazaharul Sultan.

¶42

13. This Court is of the opinion that this is not a fit case for exercising the power under Section 482 and 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Both the criminal petitions are found to be devoid of merit and stand dismissed accordingly.

¶43

JUDGE

¶44

Comparing Assistant

Md. Mazaharul Sultan v. the State of Assam and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Mazaharul Sultan v. the State of Assam and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amar Kumar Brahma Vs the State of Assam

Mrs Sangita Das Ray Vs Nitai Ch Roy

Orietal Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Sohitan Nessa and 3 Ors.

Nipom Das Vs the State of Assam

On the Death of Late Dulal Barman, His Legal Heirs, 1(A )Smti Dipika Barman Vs Smti Saraswati Barman

Dulal Baraman and Anr. Vs Saraswati Barman