The petitioner moved a contempt petition challenging non-compliance with a prior order. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the directions were complied with. Consequently, the court closed the petition without issuing substantive orders or comments.
Closed the contempt petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/1
GAHC010288562023
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/785/2023
TANUJ SONOWAL
S/O LATE BIDYA SONOWAL, R/O HOLLOWDUNGA, P.S.-GOGAMUKH, DISTDHEMAJI, ASSAM
VERSUS
ANKUR BHARALI, ACS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER-CUM-CHAIRMAN OF DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE FOR COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT, DHEMAJI, P.O.DHEMAJI, DIST- DHEMAJI, ASSAM, PIN-787057
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B K GOGOI, Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
ORDER
Date : 11.06.2025
Mr. B. K. Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the directions passed by this Court vide order, dated 19.05.2023, in WP(c)2505/2023, has been complied with by the respondent.
In view of the above, the contempt petition stands closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Tanuj Sonowal
Ankur Bharali
N. Unni Krishnan Nair
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
