Suren Boro v. Anurag Goel, IAS and 3 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner filed a contempt petition for non-payment of contractual dues. The court noted that respondent no. 5 admitted liability for the amount as funds become available. The court closed the contempt petition but directed expeditious payment.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition is closed; the respondent is directed to pay the admitted amount of Rs. 89,80,281/- expeditiously.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010067242023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/176/2023
SUREN BORO
S/O SRI HAGARAM BORO, R/O VILL AND P.O.-DIMAKUCHI, DISTUDALGURI, ASSAM, PIN-784526
VERSUS
ANURAG GOEL, IAS AND 3 ORS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL, BODOFA NAGAR, KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM
2:AMAR JYOTI BARMAN SECRETARY PWD BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL BODOFA NAGAR KOKRAJHAR ASSAM
3:BINOD BASUMATARY DEPUTY JOINT SECRETARY BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR ASSAM
4:JATIN BORA SECRETARY FINANCE BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR ASSAM
5:AKASH DEEP
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition is maintainable given the admission of liability by the respondents.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Suren Boro
- respondent
Anurag Goel
- respondent
Amar Jyoti Barman
- respondent
Binod Basumatary
- respondent
Jatin Bora
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- Cont.Cas(C)/176/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court