Allowed

Ronen Warisa v. the State of Assam

Gauhati HC10 Aug 2025I.A.(Civil)/2292/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this application, the High Court allowed the correction of clerical errors in an affidavit filed by the petitioner in an ongoing writ petition. The errors pertained to the description of the matter and the omission of the word 'New' regarding patta numbers.

What did the court decide?

The prayers for correction of clerical errors in the additional affidavit are allowed; the order is to be considered in all further hearings of the writ petition.

Ronen Warisa Vs the State of Assam — Land Acquisition | Gauhati HC (2025)

Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010004482023

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2292/2025 in WP(C)/157/2023

¶6

RONEN WARISA S/O- LT. DONGPRON WARISA R/O- VILL- LONGMAISA DIKRONG P.O. DEHANGI DIST.- DIMA HASAO PIN- 788819

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM (LR) DEPTT. DISPUR GHY-06

¶9

2:THE NORTH CACHAR HILLS AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL HAFLONG REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DIST.- DIMA HASAO PIN- 788819 ASSAM 3:THE DY. COMMISSIONER DIST.- DIMA HASAO HAFLONG PIN- 788819 ASSAM

¶10

4:THE SECRETARY AND REVENUE OFFICER (W) NORTH CACHAR HILLS AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL HAFLONG DIST.- DIMA HASAO

¶11

Page No.# 2/3

¶12

PIN- 788819 ASSAM 5:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS ROAD DEPTT. (EAP) FATASIL AMBARI GHY DIST.- KAMRUP (M) PIN- 781025 6:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. (ROAD DIVISION) HAFLONG DIST.- DIMA HASAO PIN- 788819 ASSAM 7:LOT PATOWARI I/C REVENUE DEPTT. NORTH CACHAR HILLS AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL HAFLONG DIST.- DIMA HASAO PIN- 788819 ASSAM -----------Advocate for : MR. B BARUAH Advocate for : appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM

¶13

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI

¶14

ORDER

¶15

11.08.2025

¶16

Heard Shri B. Baruah, learned counsel for the applicant / writ petitioner, who by means of this application has prayed for two corrections in the additional affidavit filed on 27.02.2025. Firstly, he has submitted that in the cause--title has been structured in the following manner:

¶17

“In the matter of:

¶18

An affidavit-in-opposition filed by the respondent no. 4, the Secretary, Revenue North Cachar Hills Autonomous Council, Dima

¶19

Page No.# 3/3

¶20

Hasao District, Haflong.”

¶21

He has submitted that the same was done by inadvertent error as it should have been

¶22

“In the matter of:

¶23

An Additional Affidavit by the petitioner”.

¶24

Secondly, he has contended that in paragraph nos. 2, 4 & 5, the expression “New” has been inadvertently omitted while describing the Patta Number of the land in question. He has clarified that the said Patta has been written as Annual Khiraj Patta No. 19 in lieu of Annual Khiraj Patta No. 19 (New).

¶25

Similarly, against Patta No. 97, it should have been Patta No. 97(New).

¶26

Also heard Shri C. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel, NHAC as well as Shri H. Sarma, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam, who have not objecting in principle.

¶27

After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the aforesaid prayers are allowed. It is clarified that this order be taken into consideration in all further hearings of the writ petition.

¶28

The I.A. accordingly stands allowed.

¶29

Comparing Assistant

Ronen Warisa v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ronen Warisa v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gulmehara Khatun Vs the State of Assam and Othrs

Eliza Begum Vs the State of Assam and Othrs

Shiv Narayan Prasad Vs the State of Assam and Othrs

Smti Premoda Tamuli and 4 Ors. Vs the State of Assam and 5 Ors.

Ismail Hussain and 9 Ors. Vs Union of India and 6 Ors.

Sri Pritam Sovasaria Vs the Union of India