Disposed¶20

Joydev Majumder @ Jaydev Mazumdar v. the State of Assam

Gauhati HC12 May 2025Bail Appln./282/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Gauhati High Court bail application (Bail Appln./282/2025) of Joydev Majumder @ Jaydev Mazumdar v. State of Assam, decided 13.05.2025 by Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita. Interim bail of 11.02.2025 made absolute after charge-sheet No. 60/2025 dated 30.03.2025; connected case Bail Application No. 440/2025 (absolute bail, 19.02.2025); conditions: co-operation in trial and appearance before Trial Court as required.

What did the court decide?

Interim bail of 11.02.2025 made absolute, subject to the petitioner co-operating in the trial and appearing before the Trial Court as and when so required. ¶20

Joydev Majumder @ Jaydev Mazumdar Vs the State of Assam — Gauhati HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010022922025

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : Bail Appln./282/2025

¶6

JOYDEV MAJUMDER @ JAYDEV MAZUMDAR S/O NIRANJAN MAZUMDAR R/O BIRUBARI, SANKARPUR,P.S.PALTAN BAZAR, DIST. KAMRUP (M), PIN -781016, ASSAM

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM

¶9

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A LAL, P GANDHIYA,B C SANGTAM,M K DEB,MR A BRAHMA

¶10

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,

¶11

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA

¶12

ORDER

¶13

Date : 13.05.2025

¶14

Heard Mr. A. Lal, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. Baidhya, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent, who submits that though the case dairy was called for, however, in the meanwhile the charge has been laid vide charge-sheet No. 60/2025 dated 30.03.2025

¶15

Page No.# 2/2

¶16

against the present petitioner.

¶17

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that by order dated 11.02.2025, the petitioner was allowed to go on interim bail by this Court and in pursuant to the directions of this Court, the petitioner has complied with the conditions of the interim bail.

¶18

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the meanwhile in a connected case, the petitioner was granted absolute bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court by order dated 19.02.2025 in Bail Application No. 440/2025.

¶19

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is cooperating in the investigation and, therefore, his custodial detention may not be necessary.

¶20

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the fact that the charge-sheet has been laid, the interim bail granted to the petitioner by this Court by order dated 11.02.2025 is hereby made absolute subject to the condition that the petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and appear before the Trial Court as and when so required by the Trial Court. With the above observations, this bail application is disposed of.

¶21

JUDGE

¶22

Comparing Assistant

Joydev Majumder @ Jaydev Mazumdar v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Joydev Majumder @ Jaydev Mazumdar v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bishal Tamang Vs the State of Assam

Utjal Tamang Vs the State of Assam

Diplu Basumatary Vs the State of Assam

Smti Santi Devi and 3 Ors. Vs Wallus Sahid and13 Ors.

Sri Jahurul Miya Vs the State of Assam

Smti Santi Devi and 3 Ors. Vs Wallus Sahid and13 Ors.