Allowed¶6

Rado Bui v. the State of Assam

Gauhati HC12 May 2025AB/766/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory/pre-arrest bail, Gauhati High Court, 13-05-2025, AB/766/2025 (Rado Bui v. State of Assam), Justice Mitali Thakuria. Section 482 BNSS 2023; Dhemaji P.S. Case No. 35/2025; Sections 61(2)/316(2) BNS 2023; Sections 14/15 Assam Game and Betting Act 1970; gambling offence; interim bail dated 01.04.2025 made absolute; cooperation with investigation; statement under Section 183 BNSS; custodial interrogation held unnecessary; incriminating materials noted; petition allowed.

What did the court decide?

Pre-arrest bail granted; interim pre-arrest bail order dated 01.04.2025 made absolute under the same terms and conditions. ¶6

Rado Bui Vs the State of Assam — Anticipatory Bail | Gauhati HC (2025)

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010067222025

2025:GAU-AS:5852

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : AB/766/2025

¶6

RADO BUI S/O- LATE LORA BUI, VILLAGE BALISOR P.O. LIKABALI PS LIKABALI LOWER SIANG ARUANCHAL PRADESH

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY P P ASSAM

¶9

Advocate for the Petitioner : R L CHUTIA, MR B DEORI,MR. M SAIKIA,MR. B K GOGOI

¶10

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,

¶11

BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA

¶12

ORDER

¶13

Date : 13-05-2025

¶14

Heard Mr. B.K. Gogoi, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. N. Das, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State respondent.

¶15

Page No.# 2/2

¶16

2. This is an application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 for granting pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, namely, Rado Bui in connection with Dhemaji P.S. Case No. 35/2025 under Sections 61(2)/316(2) of BNS, 2023, R/W Sections 14/15 of the Assam Game and Betting Act, 1970.

¶17

3. Case Diary received. Perused the same.

¶18

4. It is submitted by Mr. Gogoi, the learned counsel for the petitioner that after obtaining the order of interim pre-arrest bail on 01.04.2025, the present petitioner had already appeared before the I/O, cooperated in the investigation and his statement is also recorded u/s 183 of BNSS. Mr. Gogoi further submitted that the petitioner is still ready and willing to extend his cooperation in further investigation of the case, if the interim pre-arrest bail is hereby made absolute.

¶19

5. Ms. Das, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted in this regard that the accused/petitioner appeared before the I/O and cooperated in the investigation of the case and his statement is also recorded. However, there are some incriminating materials against the petitioner.

¶20

6. Considering the submissions made by learned counsels for both sides, materials in the Case Diary and the conduct of the accused/petitioner, I find that custodial interrogation may not be necessary for further investigation of the case and accordingly I find it a fit case to extend the privilege of pre-arrest bail to the present petitioner. Hence, the order of interim bail dated 01.04.2025 is hereby made absolute under the same terms and conditions.

¶21

JUDGE

¶22

Comparing Assistant

Rado Bui v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rado Bui v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hindustan Latex Family Planning Promotion Trust, Vs the State of Assam and 3 Ors.

Barwel Lyngdoh and Anr. Vs the State of Assam

Hareswar Boruah Vs the State of Assam

Fojor Ali and Anr. Vs the State of Assam and Anr.

Abdul Jalil @ Botai Vs the State of Assam

Aminur Hussain Vs the State of Assam