Dismissed¶21

Hindustan Latex Family Planning Promotion Trust, v. the State of Assam and 3 Ors.

Gauhati HC8 May 2025Review.Pet./43/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Review petition withdrawal with liberty to file review application before learned Single Judge; liberty conditional on permission of law; Hindustan Latex Family Planning Promotion Trust v. State of Assam / National Health Mission Assam / Mission Director NHM / Community Action Through Motivation Programme Camp; Gauhati High Court; Review.Pet./43/2025; decided 09-05-2025; dismissed as withdrawn; bench: Vijay Bishnoi, CJ and Mitali Thakuria, J.

What did the court decide?

Review petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to the petitioner to file an application for review before the learned Single Judge, if law permits. ¶21

Hindustan Latex Family Planning Promotion Trust, Vs the State of Assam and 3 Ors. — Gauhati HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010069542025

2025:GAU-AS:5743-DB

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : Review.Pet./43/2025

¶6

HINDUSTAN LATEX FAMILY PLANNING PROMOTION TRUST, THOROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY AWANISH AWASTHI, AGE 46 YEARS, HAVING ITS CORPORATE OFFICE AT B - 14A, 2ND FLOOR, SECTOR-62, NOIDA 201307, UTTAR PRADESH.

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

1: THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS THROUGH HEALTH AND FAMILY WRLFARE, DEPTT., GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI 781006

¶9

2:THE NATIONAL HEALTH MISSION ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE MISSION DIRECTOR HAVING ITS OFFICE AT SAIKIA COMMERCIAL COMPLEX SRI NAGAR PATH NEAR P.O. BUS STAND G.S. ROAD CHRISTIANBASTI GUWAHAT 781005

¶10

3:THE MISSION DIRECTOR NATIONAL HEALTH MISSION (NHM) OFFICE OF THE MISSION DIRECTOR SAIKIA COMMERCIAL COMPLEX SRINAGAR PATH CHRISTIANBASTI G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI 781005 ASSAM.

¶11

4:THE COMMUNITY ACTION THROUGH MOTIVATION PROGRAMME CAMP REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT F 106 GARDEN RESIDENCY CHUNA BHATTI BHOPAL MADHYA PRADESH 46201

¶12

For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. P.K. Goswami, Sr. Advocate, assisted by Ms. G. Goswami, Advocate.

¶13

For the Respondent(s) : Mr. B. Gogoi, Standing Counsel, Health Department.

¶14

Page No.# 2/2

¶15

– B E F O R E –

¶16

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA

¶17

09-05-2025

¶18

(Vijay Bishnoi, CJ)

¶19

After attempting to argue the matter for quite some time, Mr. P.K. Goswami, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, has submitted that he wants to withdraw this review petition with liberty for the petitioner to file an application for review before the learned Single Judge.

¶20

Mr. B. Gogoi, learned standing counsel, Health Department has submitted that such liberty cannot be granted.

¶21

Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, we are of the view that if the review petitioner wants to withdraw the review petition with liberty as prayed for, the same can be granted only if the law permits the review petitioner to approach the learned Single Judge by filing a review application. Hence, this review petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for, if law permits to do so.

¶22

JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE

¶23

Comparing Assistant

Hindustan Latex Family Planning Promotion Trust, v. the State of Assam and 3 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hindustan Latex Family Planning Promotion Trust, v. the State of Assam and 3 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhabadwip Borah @ Sri Bhabadup Borah and Anr. Vs the State of Assam and Anr.

Ruhul Amin Vs Noor Nehar

Shukkur Ali @ Sukur Ali and 2 Ors. Vs the State of Assam

Barwel Lyngdoh and Anr. Vs the State of Assam

Hareswar Boruah Vs the State of Assam

Jakir Hussain and Anr. Vs the State of Assam