No substantive content; the writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner was unrepresented on repeated occasions despite a prior warning that adverse order would follow. Nothing of general application is decided by this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010026892020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/968/2020
SAKINA KHATUN
W/O- MUKSHED ALI, R/O- VILL BHATANAPAITY CHAR, P.S- BAGHBAR, DIST- BARPETA, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, HOME DEPTT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM
2:THE DM CUM DC BARPETA DIST- BARPETA ASSAM
3:THE SP (B) DIST- BARPETA ASSAM
4:THE ELECTION OFFICER BARPETA DIST-BARPETA ASSAM
5:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE ALOPATICHAR P.S DIST- BARPETA ASSAM
6:THE ASSAM COORDINATOR NRC ASSAM BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI- 781005
Page No.# 2/2
7:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA NEW DELHI- 110001
8:THE UNION OF INDIA REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF INDIA MIN OF HOME AFFAIRS NEW DELHI- 11000
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R SARMA
Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I.
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
ORDER
Date : 10-05-2024 (M.R.Pathak, J)
No representation on behalf of the petitioner on call, though the names of three counsels have been reflected in the cause-list.
Even in the first half, when the matter was taken up for consideration, the petitioner remained un-represented.
Order-sheet discloses that on last occasion, i.e., on 29.04.2024, the petitioner remained unrepresented. In our earlier order dated 29.04.2024, we have noted that the Court earlier on 20.02.2023 observed that in the event none appears for the petition on a subsequent date, adverse order shall follow.
This petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
JUDGE JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Sakina Khatun
The State of Assam
The DM cum DC Barpeta
The SP (B) Barpeta
The Election Officer Barpeta
The Officer in Charge Alopatichar P.S. Barpeta
Manash Ranjan Pathak
Mridul Kumar Kalita
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
