Anita Mandal @ Roy v. the Union of India and 5 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petitions were closed as the petitioners were not present and a reference regarding their citizenship status was pending before the Foreigners Tribunal, making the pendency of the writ petitions ineffective.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/9
GAHC010216922018
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/6951/2018
MOTILAL SAYNNAL AND ANR.
S/O- LT GAJENDRA SAYNNAL@RAY, BY RELIGION HINDU, A PERMANENT R/O- VILL- DAIRABARI, P.O. SARUTAPA, P.S. BARPETA, DIST- BARPETA, ASSAM
2: MEGHLAL SAYNNAL S/O- LT GAJENDRA SAYNNAL@RAY BY RELIGION HINDU A PERMANENT R/O- VILL- DAIRABARI P.O. SARUTAPA P.S. BARPETA DIST- BARPETA ASSA
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS.
REP. BY THE SECY. OF THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, UNION OF INDIA, NEW DELHI
2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM HOME DEPTT. DISPUR GHY-6
3:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA REP. BY THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA NIRVACHAN SADAN ASHOKA ROAD NEW DELHI
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be closed given the pendency of a reference before the Foreigners Tribunal?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MOTILAL SAYNNAL AND ANR
- respondent
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS
Coram
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP(C)/6918/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court