Viliebei Meru v. Tensing Rongpi
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed a contempt petition, observing that since a prior speaking order dated 14.08.2024 was passed pursuant to an earlier order, prima facie, the aspect of willful disobedience does not arise. The petitioner was granted liberty to challenge the speaking order.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed with liberty to challenge the speaking order dated 14.08.2024 in accordance with law.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010053152023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/138/2023
VILIEBEI MERU
S/O- LATE PATRICK SOLO, R/O- VILL.- TOKBI, NAHORJAN, BLOCK-2, P.O. AND P.S. DILLAI, PIN- 782480, DIST. KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM
VERSUS
TENSING RONGPI
THE JOINT SECRETARY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, THE KARBI AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL, DIPHU, KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM, PIN- 782461.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S C BISWAS, MRS. R RONGMEI,MS. S DEVI,MS. K L R YANTHAN,MR. A ULLAH,MS. U NANDA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR J CHUTIYA, MR M S DEORI,MS. S KEMPRAI
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner committed deliberate or willful disobedience of a previous court order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Viliebei Meru
- respondent
Tensing Rongpi
Coram
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- Cont.Cas(C)/138/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court