Petitioner sought partition of land; counsel stated he would instead approach the Revenue authorities and did not wish to press the petition. The High Court closed the writ petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010103692024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3252/2024
LALIT DUARAH S/O- LATE PREMADHAR DUARAH, R/O- VILLAGE- KOTHALBARI, P.O- JARABARI, P.S- AMGURI, DIST- SIVASAGAR, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE AND D.M DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06.
2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
DISTRICT- SIVASAGAR PIN- 785640.
3:THE ADDL. DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
SIVASAGAR DISTRICT- SIVASAGAR PIN- 785640.
4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
AMGURI REVENUE CIRCLE SIVASAGAR ASSAM PIN- 785640
Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. PJ Saikia
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. A Bhattacharjee
Standing counsel, Revenue Department Government of Assam Mr. N Goswami Government Advocate.
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER
02.08.2024
Mr. PJ Saikia, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he would approach the Revenue authorities for partition of the land belonging to the petitioner and, as such, he would not like to press the instant writ petition.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should proceed or be withdrawn in view of the petitioner's intention to seek partition before the Revenue authorities.
Lalit Duarah
The State of Assam
The District Commissioner, Sivasagar
The Addl. District Commissioner, Sivasagar
The Circle Officer, Amguri Revenue Circle
Devashis Baruah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
