Amran Hussain Laskar v. the State of Assam and 3 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court held two writ petitions infructuous and closed them, as the State Government had already directed cancellation of the settlement process and inclusion of a bid qualification clause regarding settled values.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010126472024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3247/2024
AMRAN HUSSAIN LASKAR
S/O- LATE SAMAR ALI, VILL.- HAIDUBI, P.O. BATAMARI, DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006.
2:THE NAGAON ZILLA PARISHAD REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER NAGAON ZILLA PARISHAD P.O. AND DIST. NAGAON ASSAM PIN- 782001.
3:THE BATADRAVA ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT REPRESENTED BY ITS IN-CHARGE PRESIDENT P.O. DHING DIST. NAGAON ASSAM PIN- 782123.
4:THE EXRCUTIVE OFFICER BATADRAVA ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT P.O. DHING DIST. NAGAON ASSAM PIN- 782123
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
AMRAN HUSSAIN LASKAR
- respondent
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
Coram
DEVASHIS BARUAH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP(C)/3247/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court