Disposed

Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. v. State of Mizoram and Anr.

Gauhati HC11 Nov 2024Crl.Pet./24/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Gauhati High Court disposed of a petition for quashing a bail order under Section 483(3) Cr.P.C. read with BNSS Section 528. The petitioner alleged fraud and forgery but accepted the lower court's direction to dispose of the matter since the Investigating Officer sought discharge of the respondent.

What did the court decide?

The petition was disposed of with a direction to the jurisdictional court to pass necessary orders in accordance with law.

Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Gauhati HC (2024)

¶1

Page No.# 1/3

¶2

GAHC030005822024

¶3

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶4

Case No. : Crl.Pet./24/2024

¶5

Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. Through Sh. Chanpreet Singh Business Head Having Registered Office at Gateway Building, Apollo Bunder Mumbai - 100 001

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

State of Mizoram and Anr. R/b the Secretary Home Department, Aizawl 2:Sh. Sandeep Sarma

¶8

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Sr. Adv.

¶9

Advocate for the Respondent : P.P./Addl.PP, Mizoram for R1

¶10

ORDER

¶11

BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.P. KHAUND

¶12

12.11.2024

¶13

Learned counsel, Mr. C. Zoramchhana is present on behalf of the petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd., learned counsel, Mr. A.R. Malhotra is present on behalf of the respondent No. 2 and learned Public Prosecutor, Mrs. Linda L. Fambawl is present on behalf of the State respondent.

¶14

Page No.# 2/3

¶15

The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 483(3) Cr.PC read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagaarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 for quashing the impugned Order dated 13.08.2024 passed by the Court of the Judicial Magistrate First Class-III, Aizawl Judicial District, Aizawl in connection with Bail Application No. 914/2024, granting bail to the respondent No. 2, Mr. Sandeep Sarmah.

¶16

It is submitted that the petitioner had lodged an FIR with the Police at Aizawl Police Station against Jakir Habbibur Hussain and others with allegations of fraud and forgery. The FIR was registered as Aizawl P.S. Case No. 96/2024 and investigation commenced.

¶17

Meanwhile, the business head of the petitioner learnt that Jakir Habbibur Hussain had impersonated him with an aid of his co-conspirators and had created a fake entity, i.e., Mahindra Financial Services Limited or MMFSL and executed fraudulent transactions in connivance with car dealers including the present respondent No. 2 and other co-accused persons using a fraudulent bank account of Mizoram Rural Bank. Accordingly, the P.S. Crime & Economic Offences (C&EO) was registered as C&EO No. 3/2024 for punishable under Sections 408, 419, 466, 467, 468, 472, 471, 477A, 120B r/w 34 of IPC.

¶18

It is submitted that Charge-sheet has been laid in connection with Aizawl P.S Case No. 96/2024. Charge-sheet as well as supplementary Charge-sheet has been laid.

¶19

It is submitted at the bar that as the respondent No. 2 was not found involved in the fraud and forgery activities, while filing Charge-sheet, the I.O has prayed for discharging the respondent No. 2.

¶20

I have scrutinized the CD.

¶21

Page No.# 3/3

¶22

As there is a prayer by the I.O to discharge the respondent No. 2, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned jurisdictional Court to pass necessary orders in accordance with law.

¶23

In terms of the above observation, this petition stands disposed of.

¶24

Send back the CD.

¶25

JUDGE

¶26

Comparing Assistant

Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. v. State of Mizoram and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. v. State of Mizoram and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Lalzuali and Anr. Vs Sh. B. Sanghnuna Now dead substituted by his son David Lalchhuanawma and 5 Ors.

Sh. Rosangpuia Vs The State of Mizoram and Anr.

Sh. R.Lalruatpuia and 2 Ors. Vs Dr. Renu Sharma and 4 Ors.

Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. through Sh. Chanpreet Singh, Business Head Vs State of Mizoram and Anr.

Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. Vs State of Mizoram and Anr.

Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. Vs State of Mizoram and Anr.