Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. v. State of Mizoram and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
GAHC030005112024 THE GAUHATI
GAHC030005112024 THE GAUHATI
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC030005112024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Crl.Pet./18/2024
Proloy Das House No. 5 Jangla Kalibari Road Khadiman Karimganj
VERSUS
State of Mizoram Aizawl
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Makhan Phukhan Advocate for the Respondent : P.P./Addl.PP Mizoram
Linked Case : I.A.(Crl.)/40/2024
Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. Through Sh. Chanpreet Singh Business Head Having Registered Office at Gateway Building, Apollo Bunder Mumbai - 400 001
VERSUS
State of Mizoram and Anr. Through the Public Prosecutor
Page No.# 2/2
Gauhati High Court, Aizawl Bench 2:Sh. Proloy Da
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Sr. Adv.
Advocate for the Respondent : P.P./Addl.PP, Mizoram
ORDER B E F O R E
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
12.11.2024
Heard learned counsel, Mr. Vikash Jammar for the petitioner, Proloy Das and learned Public Prosecutor, Mrs. Linda L. Fambawl for the State respondent.
The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted to file additional affidavit to place copies of both the Charge-sheets relating to C&EO No. 3/2024 and Aizawl P.S. Case No. 96/2024 in this Court.
The prayer to file the additional affidavit alongwith the certified copies of the Charge-sheet of Aizawl PS Case No. 96/2024 and C&EO No. 3/2024 is allowed.
List the matter after 2(two) weeks.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Proloy Das
State of Mizoram
SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court