Contempt petition alleging non-compliance with earlier High Court directions; counsel submitted the first respondent complied by a speaking order dated 5 July 2024 and petitioner did not wish to pursue the matter, so the court closed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010123932024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/351/2024
GIAS UDDIN AHMED
S/O LATE RUKON UDDIN AHMED
HEAD ASSISTANT, O/O DEPUTY INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS, SILCHAR, CACHAR, R/O ZAKARIA MANSION, TALUKDAR LANE, ITKHOLA, GHANIWALA ROAD, VTC MELA ROAD, P.O. MALUGRAM, SILCHAR, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN-788002
VERSUS
DR. SURANJANA SENAPATI AND 2 ORS. ACS,
THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, ASSAM, KAHILIPARA, GUWAHATI, ASSAM, PIN-781019.
2:SMTI. BONNYKHA CHETIA ACS
THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER CACHAR SILCHAR ASSAM PIN-788003
3:IKBAL HUSSAIN BARBHUIYA THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS SILCHAR CACHAR ASSAM PIN-78800
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B PURKAYASTHA Advocate for the Respondent :
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR
ORDER
Date : 15.07.2024
Mr. B. Purkayastha, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that after filing the present contempt petition, the respondent No. 1 has complied with the directions passed by this Court by passing a speaking order on 5th July, 2024. He, therefore, submits that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the present contempt petition.
Accordingly, the contempt petition is closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Gias Uddin Ahmed
Dr. Suranjana Senapati, ACS, The Director of Elementary Education, Assam
Smti. Bonnykha Chetia ACS
Ikbal Hussain Barbhuiya
Lanusungkum Jamir
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
