Abu Bakkar Mazumder and 2 Ors. v. Sanjeeb Kumar Das and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt case closed after counsel for the petitioners submitted that the order of the Court had already been complied with.
Contempt case closed after counsel for the petitioners submitted that the order of the Court had already been complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010091922020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/281/2020
ABU BAKKAR MAZUMDER AND 2 ORS. S/O- ABDUL KHALIQUE MAZUMDER, R/O- VILL- BIDRUHIPAR, P.SKACHUDARM, DIST- CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 788119
2: RAMIJ UDDIN LASKAR S/O- LATE AKADDAS ALI LASKAR VILL- DAKSHIN MOHANPUR P.S- SONAI DIST- CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788150
3: RIYAZUL HAQUE LASKAR S/O- MOUR UDDIN LASKAR VILL-DAKSHIN MOHANPUR PART XI P.S- SONAI DIST CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 78815
VERSUS
SANJEEB KUMAR DAS AND ANR.
THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT, PANJABARI, JURIPAR, PIN- 781037
2:S N SINGH ACS THE CEO CACHAR ZILLA PARISHAD P.O- SILCHAR DIST- CACHAR PIN- 78811
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. L R MAZUMDER, MR. A Z AHMED
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
ORDER
Date : 13/09/2024
Mr. L.R. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of this Court has
already been complied with and, therefore, this contempt case be closed.
Taking note of the submission of Mr. Mazumdar, this contempt case stands closed.
JUDGE
sukhamay
Comparing Assistant
Abu Bakkar Mazumder
Ramij Uddin Laskar
Riyazul Haque Laskar
Sanjeeb Kumar Das
The Commissioner, Panchayat and Rural Development Deptt
S N Singh ACS, CEO Cachar Zilla Parishad
Suman Shyam
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court