The Gauhati High Court dismissed an interlocutory application because the main connected writ petition was decided on the same day, rendering this further order unnecessary.
The interlocutory application stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010174942015
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/932/2016
RAJU KUMAR BASUMATARY and 6 ORS.
VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 63 ORS -----------Advocate for : MR.R HAQUE Advocate for : GA ASSAM R1 appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 63 ORS
Linked Case : WP(C)/6692/2015
RAJU KUMAR BASUMATARY and 6 ORS. S/O- MEGHNATH BASUMATARY VILL.- KACHIRTARI P.O.- SAUDARVITA DIST.- BAKSA ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 63 ORS TO BE REP. BY THE CHIEF SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM DISPUR GHY- 6.
-----------Advocate for : MR.A U AHMED Advocate for : GA ASSAMR1 appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 63 ORS
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
ORDER
Date : 13.06.2024
In view of the order passed by this Court today in the connected writ petition being WP(c)6692/2015; no further order is called for in this interlocutory application and the interlocutory application accordingly stands dismissed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
WP(c)/6692/2015Referred¶16
Raju Kumar Basumatary and 6 Ors
The State of Assam and 63 Ors
N. Unni Krishnan Nair
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
