Disposed
Madhudipa Dey v. the State of Assam and 3 Ors.
Gauhati HCI.A.(Civil)/3492/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
GAHC010269322023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
What the court decided
AI extract
GAHC010269322023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010269322023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3492/2023
MADHUDIPA DEY
W/O LATE SRIBASH CHANDRA DEY
RESIDENT OF PRATAP SHARMA ROAD, AMOLAPATTY, PO ITACHI, DIST NAGAON, ASSAM, 782003.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, GOVT. OF ASSAM, EXCISE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GHY 06, ASSAM
2:THE COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX DISPUR GUWAHATI 06
3:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF EXCISE NAGAON ASSAM 782003
4:FINANCE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT
GOVT. OF ASSAM REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM GROUND FLOOR F BLOCK JANATA BHAWAN DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. JYOTIRMOY ROY
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, EXCISE DEPTT.
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
ORDER
Date : 04-04-2024
Heard Mr. J. Roy, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Mr. RR Gogoi, learned standing counsel for the Excise Department and Ms. M. Barman, learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the State respondent.
The substituted applicant has prayed for impleading the Finance and Taxation Department, Govt. of Assam represented by The Commissioner & Secretary to the Govt. of Assam as respondent no.4 in the connected writ petition.
Prayer is allowed.
The application stands disposed of.
Comparing Assistant
Madhudipa Dey
The State of Assam
Kalyan Rai Surana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court