In a bail application, the High Court observed that since the charge sheet was laid, the petitioner should approach the Trial Court for bail if advised, disposing of the application without granting bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010068342024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./971/2024
ABIDUR RAHMAN
S/O. LT. NUR ISLAM, R/O. BAGA SATYAGRAM, P.S. DHOLAI, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM.CACHAR ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR ALONGBAR BASUMATARY, MR. M M ZAMAN,MR N AHMED,MR. N J DUTTA
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
ORDER
Date : 09.08.2024
Heard Mr. N. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent who submits that though the case diary was called for, however, in the meanwhile charge sheet has been laid bearing charge sheet No. 09/2024 dated 05.08.2024.
Page No.# 2/2
In view of the laying of the charge sheet, this bail application is disposed of with an observation that the petitioner may approach the Trial Court and may pray for bail before the said court, if so advised.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Abidur Rahman
The State of Assam Represented by PP, Assam
Mridul Kumar Kalita
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
