Anticipatory bail application withdrawn after the State informed that a charge sheet was filed adding an offence under section 4 of the POCSO Act. Petitioner sought liberty to approach the jurisdictional Court; the High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010138132024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./2022/2024
SAPIER MONIN @ SP
S/O LATE SOTENDRA SANGMA, R/O BAKA MANIK NAGAR, P.S.-BAIHATA CHARIALI, DIST-KAMRUP, ASSAM
VERSUS
STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K SHARMA
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
ORDER
12.07.2024
At the outset Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned APP has submitted that as per instructions received by him, charge sheet has already been submitted in this matter with addition of offence committed by the petitioner under section 4 of the POCSO Act.
Page No.# 2/2
On such information being provided Mr. A.K. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition and to move the jurisdictional Court.
Prayer is allowed.
Matter stands dismissed on withdrawal as indicated above.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail petition should be entertained after charge sheet with added POCSO Section 4 offence.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sapier Monin @ SP
State of Assam represented by the Public Prosecutor, Assam
Kalyan Rai Surana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
