In a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the Gauhati High Court granted bail to the petitioner, despite opposing counsel citing injuries to a home guard and absconding co-accused, deeming further custodial interrogation unnecessary.
Bail granted on furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/- with one suitable surety of like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010122382024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./1648/2024
SOYNAL HOQUE S/O PANAR UDDIN R/O VILL- TAKIMARI P.O. AND P.S.-SUKCHAR DIST-SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR ASSAM PIN-783128
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ASSAM
-----------Advocate for : MR. S H ZAMAN Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
ORDER
Date : 11.07.2024
Heard Mr. M. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned APP for the State.
Page No.# 2/4
Page No.# 3/4
Act, 2021, the animal “Buffalo” is not included.
The bail is granted on the following conditions:
Page No.# 4/4
8. Case diary is returned.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner be released on bail after furnishing bail bond.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Soynal Hoque
The State of Assam
Kalyan Rai Surana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
