Allowed

Rajumoni Ali @ Aminul Hoque v. the State of Assam

Gauhati HC14 Jul 2024Bail Appln./2014/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeks release for the accused arrested in a criminal dispute. The High Court granted bail after noting co-accused were bailed and further custody was unnecessary.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail with a bond of Rs. 25,000 and one surety of like amount subject to conditions regarding jurisdiction and investigation.

Rajumoni Ali @ Aminul Hoque Vs the State of Assam — Cheating and Forgery | Gauhati HC (2024)

¶1

Page No.# 1/3

¶2

GAHC010137922024

¶3

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶4

Case No. : Bail Appln./2014/2024

¶5

RAJUMONI ALI @ AMINUL HOQUE

¶6

S/O MD. NIZAMUDDIN AHMED, R/O VILL- KHAS SONAPUR, P.S.-SIPAJHAR, DIST- DARRANG, ASSAM

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM

¶9

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H R A CHOUDHURY

¶10

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM

¶11

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY

¶12

ORDER

¶13

15.07.2024

¶14

Heard Mr. H. R. A. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. M. Hoque, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. Baishya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.

¶15

This is an application made under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha

¶16

Page No.# 2/3

¶17

Sanhita, 2023 seeking bail by the accused/petitioner, namely, Rajumoni Ali @ Aminul Hoque , who was arrested on 20.06.2024 in connection with Sipajhar P.S. Case No. 94/2024 registered under Sections 120(B)/420/468/506 of IPC.

¶18

Mr. Baishya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam has vehemently objected the prayer of the petitioner to grant bail.

¶19

It is seen that co-accused have already been enlarged on bail. It is also seen that there are civil litigation pending between the parties and the incident occurred in connection with such civil dispute. The petitioner was arrested on 20.06.2024 and since then, he is in custody.

¶20

Considering the matter in entirety and the period of detention, this Court is of the considered opinion that the further custodial interrogation of the accused/petitioner shall not be required for the purpose of investigation.

¶21

Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner, named above, be released on bail in connection with the case aforementioned, on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Darrang, Mangaldoi, Assam, with the following conditions.

¶22

(a) Shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Darrang, Mangaldoi, Assam, without prior written permission from him/her;

¶23

(b) Shall not hamper with the investigation of the case and tamper with the evidence of the case;

¶24

(c) Shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police office.

¶25

Page No.# 3/3

¶26

In terms of the above, this bail application stands disposed of.

¶27

JUDGE

¶28

Comparing Assistant

Rajumoni Ali @ Aminul Hoque v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajumoni Ali @ Aminul Hoque v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Foriz Uddin Laskar Vs the State of Assam

Jashim Uddin Laskar Vs the State of Assam

Jubeda Hanun and Ors. Vs the State of Assam

M/S a K and Company Vs Sk. Abidul Hussain

Kulen Nath Vs the State of Assam

Pinkee Tamuli Vs the State of Assam