Ikramul Ali v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
This bail application was rejected because charges were framed under the NDPS Act citing transportation of commercial quantity of contraband. The court held that with the trial at its nascent stage and no witnesses examined, Section 37 embargo makes bail unjustified.
What did the court decide?
Bail application stands rejected; matter disposed of.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010095702024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./1387/2024
IKRAMUL ALI S/O IMAN ALI R/O VILL- SIALMARI, KUMARTUP, P.S. SADAR DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P RAHMAN, MR S ISLAM
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
ORDER
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner facing charge-sheet under the NDPS Act at the nascent stage of the trial.
Whether the embargo under Section 37 of the NDPS Act precludes consideration of bail.
Whether the averment of transporting commercial quantity of contraband provides sufficient grounds to deny bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ikramul Ali
- respondent
The State of Assam
Coram
Susmita Phukan Khaund
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- Bail Appln./1387/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court