The Gauhati High Court rejected the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023. Finding incriminating materials in the Case Diary, the court held there were no justified grounds to grant bail and sent back the diary.
Petition rejected; Case Diary sent back.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010137942024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1778/2024
FARUK ALI @ OMAR FARUK S/O FULCHAN ALI,
VILL.- FALIMARI PART- I, P.S. AND DIST.- DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN- 783325.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY P.P.
Advocate for the Petitioner : M HOSSAIN, MR J HUSSAIN,MD A WADUD,MR. Z H AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
ORDER
16.08.2024
Heard learned counsel, Mr M Hossain, for the petitioner, Faruk Ali @ Omar Faruk,
who has filed this application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, with prayer for pre-
arrest bail as he is apprehending arrest in connection with Dhubri PS Case No. 112/2024, corresponding to GR Case No. 371/2024.
Page No.# 2/2
are incriminating materials in the Case Diary against the petitioner. The victim Hekmat Ali has sustained grievous injuries on his head.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Dhubri PS Case No. 112/2024.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Faruk Ali @ Omar Faruk
The State of Assam
Susmita Phukan Khaund
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
