Dismissed

Ali Amjod @ Ali Ajmol v. the State of Assam

Gauhati HC14 May 2024AB/427/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail application under CrPC s. 438, the High Court refused to grant bail due to the petitioner's prior summons and subsequent warrant. The court referenced the Tofan Singh ruling on Section 67 NDPS statements but directed the petitioner to approach the Trial Court for regular bail while keeping the arrest warrant in abeyance until June 15, 2024.

What did the court decide?

The operation of the non-bailable warrant against the petitioner is stayed until 15.06.2024; petitioner directed to appear before Trial Court for regular bail.

Ali Amjod @ Ali Ajmol Vs the State of Assam — Narcotics (NDPS) | Gauhati HC (2024)

¶1

Page No.# 1/4

¶2

GAHC010033292024

¶3

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶4

Case No. : AB/427/2024

¶5

ALI AMJOD @ ALI AJMOL S/O MD. MOYUB ALI VILL- KALKALIBASTI, P.S. PATHARKANDI P.S. AND DIST. KARIMGANJ, ASSAM

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM

¶8

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H R CHOUDHURY

¶9

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM

¶10

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA

¶11

ORDER

¶12

Date : 15.05.2024

¶13

1) Heard Mr. H. R. A. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. Baishya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.

¶14

2) This anticipatory bail application has been preferred under Section 438

¶15

Page No.# 2/4

¶16

of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the present petitioner, namely, Ali Amjod @ Ali Ajmol, who is apprehending his arrest in connection with Special Case No. 35/2023 arising out of Bazaricherra P. S. Case No. 86/2023 under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C)/25/29 of the NDPS Act, 1985.

¶17

3) The gist of the accusation in this case is that on 12.04.2023, one Asish Mohanta, S.I. of police had filed an FIR before the Officer-In-Charge of Bazaricherra Police Station, inter-alia, alleging that on receiving information through reliable sources regarding movement of some illegal contraband (ganja), a search operation was conducted at Kurti village near the Kurti bridge on National Highway No. 208A and during naka checking operation, one Bajaj auto rickshaw bearing Registration No. AS 10 AC 8213 was intercepted and was searched. During search of the said vehicle, 41 packets of ganja weighing about 191.005 kgs were recovered from the possession of one Ruyel Uddin @ Jahir Uddin. On receipt of the said FIR, Bazaricherra P. S. Case No. 86/2023 was registered.

¶18

4) Later on, investigation was initiated and after completion of investigation, charge sheet was laid against the three persons, including the present petitioner, who was shown as an absconder in the charge sheet. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that nothing was seized from the possession of the present petitioner and the only allegation against the present petitioner is that during interrogation of the apprehended accused persons, the name of the present petitioner was revealed.

¶19

5) The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and in no manner involved in the offence alleged in this case.

¶20

6) The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in view of the ruling of the Apex Court in the case of “ Tofan Singh Vs. State of Tamil Nadu”

¶21

Page No.# 3/4

¶22

reported in (2021) 4 SCC 1 , the statement of the co-accused made under Section 67 of the NDPS Act, 1985 cannot be used against the other accused. 7) It is also submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the trial court has issued non-bailable warrant of arrest against the present petitioner on 12.04.2024 and has fixed the next date of appearance on 15.06.2024 and he apprehends that he may be arrested at any moment.

¶23

8) The learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the petitioner is ready to face trial and therefore, he may be allowed to go on bail. 9) On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that from scanned copy of the case record of Special Case No. 35/2023, it appears that the trial court had issued at the first instance only summons against the present petitioner and it is only when the petitioner failed to appear before the trial court after receiving the summons, the trial court had issued non-bailable warrant of arrest.

¶24

10) I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for both the sides and also perused the material available on record.

¶25

11) Though, it is no res-integra after the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of “ Tofan Singh Vs. State of Tamil Nadu” (Supra) that the statement of the co-accused recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act, 1985 is inadmissible in evidence in a trial of offence under the NDPS case, however, in the instant case, as Trial Court had issued the summons at the first instance, the petitioner may appear before the Trial Court and may pray for regular bail and plead his case for bail before the Trial Court. If such a prayer is made by the petitioner, the Trial Court shall consider the same as per law.

¶26

12) Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the petitioner is

¶27

Page No.# 4/4

¶28

hereby directed to appear before the Trial Court, i.e., the Court of learned Special Judge, Karimganj, on the next date fixed in Special Case No. 35/2023, i.e., on 15.06.2024 and may pray for any relief to which he is legally entitled to, if so advised.

¶29

13) To facilitate his appearance before the Trial Court on the next date fixed, the operation of non-bailable warrant of arrest issued against the petitioner by the trial court on 12.04.2024 shall be kept in abeyance till 15.06.2024.

¶30

14) With the above observation, this anticipatory bail application is hereby disposed of.

¶31

JUDGE

¶32

Comparing Assistant

Ali Amjod @ Ali Ajmol v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ali Amjod @ Ali Ajmol v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nazrul Islam Vs the State of Assam

Faysol Ahmed @ Rubel Vs the State of Assam

Vishal Daga Vs the State of Assam

Shiv Kumar Kanoi and Anr. Vs the State of Assam and Ors.

Abul Kalam Azad Vs the State of Assam and 2 Ors.

Sharma Ramchairy Vs the State of Assam