The Gauhati High Court disposed of a writ petition filed by the petitioner without substantive discussion. The court held that since the investigation officer submitted a final report making the petition infructuous, the matter is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010024822024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/289/2024
ASHRAFUL ALOM LASKAR S/O SAMSUL HAQUE LASKAR R/O VILL- DIDAR KUSH PART-I P.O. MATINAGAR, DIST. CACHCAR, ASSAM, PIN CODE-788099
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR G BORDOLOI
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA
ORDER
Date : 03.04.2024
Heard Mr. G. Bordoloi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.
The case was fixed for case diary, but it is submitted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that final report has been submitted by the I/O.
In this context, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that after obtaining interim pre-
Page No.# 2/2
arrest bail, the petitioner appeared before the I/O and his statement has been recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C.
In view of the submission of the final report by the I/O, the petition has become infructuous and the same is disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Ashraful Alom Laskar
The State of Assam
Mitali Thakuria
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
