Sanjika Daimary v. the State of Assam and 4 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought closure of the writ petition as the enhanced ex-gratia amount was received during its pendency.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is closed.
Petitioner sought closure of the writ petition as the enhanced ex-gratia amount was received during its pendency.
The writ petition is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010019202021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/755/2021
SANJIKA DAIMARY
W/O. LT. MADAN DAIMARY, R/O. 4TH MILE, DILLAJI, P.O. AND P.S. DIPHU, DIST. KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM, PIN-782460.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS.
REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPTT., RELIEF AND REHABILITATION BRANCH, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06.
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM PERSONNEL (B) DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006.
3:THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006.
4:THE KARBI ANGLONG AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY P.O. AND P.S. DIPHU DIST. KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM PIN-782460.
5:THE DY. COMMISSIONER
Page No.# 2/2
KARBI ANGLONG DIPHU P.O. DIPHU DIST. KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM PIN-782460
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M R KHANDAKAR
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
ORDER
09.06.2023
Mr. M.R. Khandakar, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the enhanced amount of ex-gratia has been received by the petitioner during the pendency of the writ petition and, therefore, the writ petition is to be closed.
Mr. A. Bhattacharya, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department for the respondent no. 1; Ms. M. Barman, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 2 & 5; and Ms. B. Sohe, learned counsel representing Mr. J. Chutia, learned Standing Counsel, KAAC for the respondent no. 4 are present.
In view of the above submission made by Mr. Khandakar, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
SANJIKA DAIMARY
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS.
MANISH CHOUDHURY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court