M/S Rana Constructions and Engineers Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. v. the Union of India and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
GAHC010176722023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
GAHC010176722023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010176722023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4601/2023
M/S RANA CONSTRUCTIONS AND ENGINEERS PVT LTD AND ANR A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT SURAJ COMPLEX, ULUBARI CHARIALI, GUWAHATI- 781007, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM BEING REPRESENTED BY ONE OF ITS DIRECTORS, SRI RANA SAIDUR ZAMAN
2: RANA SAIDUR ZAMAN S/O- ALHAZ RAHMAN ALI RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO.62 RAHMAN MANSION SOUTH SARANIA P.O. ULUBARI GUWAHATI- 781007 DIST.- KAMRUP (M) ASSA
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS THROUGH THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS TRANSPORT BHAWAN, 1, PARLIAMENT STREET NEW DELHI110001
2:NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN PLOT NO.-G 5 AND 6 DABRI-GURGAON ROAD DWARKA SECTOR 10 NEW DELHI- 110075
3:NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA REGIONAL OFFICER (NE) NEDFI HOUSE 4TH FLOOR GS ROAD GUWAHATI- 78100
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Petitioner : PETITIONER IN PERSON
Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I.
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
ORDER
Date : 10-08-2023
Mr. Rana Zaman, who has appeared in person, has submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition.
Mr. K. Gogoi, learned CGC for the respondent no. 1 and Mr. C. Baruah, learned Standing Counsel, National Highways Authority of India for the respondent nos. 2 & 3 have submitted that the issue raised in the writ petition has already been decided in an earlier writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 6266/2021. Be that as it may, they have no objection to the prayer made by the petitioner-inperson for withdrawal of the writ petition.
In view of the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.[C] no. 6266/2021Referred¶18
M/S RANA CONSTRUCTIONS AND ENGINEERS PVT LTD AND ANR
THE UNION OF INDIA
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
MANISH CHOUDHURY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court